ReviewJournal of asthma and allergy2020
Anti-IL5 Therapies for Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: Literature Review and Practical Insights.
Review in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Overweight and Obesity in Severe Asthma Patients and Its Influence on Achieving Clinical Remission.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Predictive model for inhaled corticosteroid response in hospitalized asthma: implications for precision medicine.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Advances in Biologic Therapies for Allergic Diseases: Current Trends, Emerging Agents, and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Biologic therapies targeting type 2 cytokines are effective at improving asthma symptoms and control-a systematic review and meta-analysis.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025Article
- The Effect of Mepolizumab on Blood Eosinophil Subtype Distribution and Granule Protein Gene Expression in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2025Article
- Eosinophils prevent diet-induced airway hyperresponsiveness in mice on a high-fat diet.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2024Article
- Immunologic Basis of Type 2 Biologics for Severe Asthma.Immune network · 2022Review
- Severe asthma in children: An official statement from Saudi Pediatric Pulmonology Association.Saudi medical journal · 2022Article
- Prevalence of eosinophilic, atopic, and overlap phenotypes among patients with severe asthma in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Observational
- Treatment Response Biomarkers in Asthma and COPD.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Real world effectiveness of benralizumab on respiratory function and asthma control.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2021Article
- A Real-World Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Biologicals and Bronchial Thermoplasty for Severe Refractory Asthma (BIOTERM).Journal of asthma and allergy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe refractory asthma (SRA) still has a high economic and social impact, including a reduction in quality of life (QoL), productivity, a greater risk of exacerbations and emergency department (ED) visits. Another major issue is the need of oral corticosteroids (OCS), often due to a poor response to standard therapies or the lack of indication for currently available biological drugs. A thorough understanding of the immunological pathways and eosinophilopoietic processes allows a correct application of the new pharmacological strategies and leads to better clinical responses. For these unmet needs, several monoclonal antibody (mAb) drugs have been introduced over the past few years. These are mainly available for allergic and especially eosinophilic uncontrolled refractory asthma. As the number of therapeutic options increases, the choice of biological drugs can be made only after careful considerations of the particular asthma endotype, patients' comorbidities and clinical data. The selection of the correct therapeutic option can therefore be guided after a careful evaluation of the particular endotype and phenotype, from the combined evaluation of inflammatory biomarkers, clinical picture and comorbidities. The careful evaluation of all these parameters can therefore help the physician in the optimal management of these complex patients, for whom it is often possible to achieve exceptional results by managing the available options in the best possible way. The aim of this review is to define the positioning of the biological drugs currently available for type 2 asthma, with a special focus on options for eosinophilic asthma in the context of the most recent knowledge of immunological pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.