Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32982317›Full record

ReviewJournal of asthma and allergy2020

Thunderstorm Asthma: Looking Back and Looking Forward.

Ajay Kevat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Extreme weather and asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Fungal Aeroallergens-The Impact of Climate Change.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Clinical Manifestations of Human Exposure to Fungi.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. The Role of Climate Change in Asthma.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Exposure Assessment for Tropical Cyclone Epidemiology.Current environmental health reports · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Thunderstorm allergy and asthma: state of the art.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ajay KevatDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9881-6478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemic thunderstorm asthma has been reported to have occurred around twenty times over the past three decades in locations around the world. Thunderstorm asthma events are characterized by a significant increase in asthma presentations, which on occasion can overwhelm local medical services and result in fatalities. This review article presents the epidemiological data underpinning previous thunderstorm asthma events and analyzes what is known about the etiology of this unusual phenomenon. The evidence behind published risk factors, both at the individual and population level, is discussed. Research from the fields of allergy, pulmonology, meteorology, and climatology is drawn together and critically reviewed to surmise future predictions regarding thunderstorm asthma episodes. Finally, evidence-based individual, community, and environmentally targeted preventive strategies are presented.

Indexed as

asthmacritical careepidemicspollenspores

Identifiers

PMID32982317
PMCPMC7501467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.