ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2020
Biological Characterization and Therapeutics for Subscalp Recurrent in Intracranial Glioblastoma.
Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- CD70 CAR-T cells empowered by TS-2021 through ex vivo transduction show potent antitumor efficacy against glioblastoma.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Article
- Olaparib Enhances the Efficacy of Third-Generation Oncolytic Adenoviruses Against Glioblastoma by Modulating DNA Damage Response and p66shc-Induced Apoptosis.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- Spreading of Alpha Synuclein from Glioblastoma Cells towards Astrocytes Correlates with Stem-like Properties.Cancers · 2022Article
- Targeting Tumor-Associated Antigen: A Promising CAR-T Therapeutic Strategy for Glioblastoma Treatment.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Efficacy of a novel double-controlled oncolytic adenovirus driven by the Ki67 core promoter and armed with IL-15 against glioblastoma cells.Cell & bioscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeGliomas are common intracranial tumors, of which 70% are malignant gliomas. Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive tumor, and patients with GBM have a median survival time of only 9-12 months; extracranial recurrence of GBM is very rare. A therapeutic strategy for this kind of recurrent tumor is lacking. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe present a case of a patient with extracranial recurrence of subscalp GBM. The subscalp tumor was resected and xenotransplanted into BALB/C nude mice. Then, glioma cells were isolated from the xenograft models and passaged in vitro. HE staining, immunohistochemistry, CCK-8 assays, karyotypic analysis, short tandem repeat STR analysis and flow cytometry were used to analyze the biological characteristics and malignant phenotype of these established cells. The cells and xenografts were then used as preclinical models to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of oncolytic herpes simplex virus 1 (oHSV-1).
resultsThe isolated cells, which were named BT-01, were positive for Nestin and GFAP. The main characteristics of BT-01 cells were that they harbored glioblastoma stem-like cells (GSCs) and that they possessed highly aggressive migration capacities compared with the existing cell lines U87-MG and U251-MG. Moreover, BT-01 cells tolerated the chemotherapeutic drug temozolomide. Our study showed that oHSV-1 could replicate in and repress the growth of BT-01 cells and significantly inhibit tumor growth in xenograft models.
conclusionTaken together, our results showed that a new recurrent glioblastoma cell line was established, which can be useful for research on recurrent glioblastoma. We provided a reliable preclinical model to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of oHSV-1 in vivo and a promising therapy for recurrent GBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.