Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32982164›Full record

Trial reportClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2020

Performance and Safety of the Extended Depth of Focus Implantable Collamer

Mark Packer, Jose F Alfonso, Jaime Aramberri, Daniel Elies, Joaquin Fernandez, Erik Mertens

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03499821 (A Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of a Phakic Intraocular Lens), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03499821 nacompletednot on this map

A Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of a Phakic Intraocular Lens

TypeinterventionalSponsorStaar Surgical CompanyRan2018 to 2019Enrolled41ConditionsPresbyopiaArmsEDOF ICL
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Surgical interventions for presbyopia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Analysis of vault prediction in phakic implantable phakic collamer lenses: manufacturer's calculator vs theoretical formulae vs clinical practice.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Correction of presbyopia.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark PackerPacker Research Associates, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2681-6641
Jose F AlfonsoOphthalmology Institute Fernández Vega, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0373-8209
Jaime AramberriOpthalmology Clinic Miranza Begitek, San Sebastian, Spain.
Daniel EliesInstitute of Ocular Microsurgery, Barcelona, Spain.
Joaquin FernandezQvision-Hospital Vithas Virgen del Mar, Almeria, Spain.
Erik MertensMedipolis, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1873-1613

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the performance and safety of the Extended Depth of Focus Implantable Collamer

designProspective multicenter study.

methodsPresbyopic subjects who required an EDOF ICL in the range of -0.50 D to -18.00 D, exhibited ≤ 0.75 D refractive astigmatism and required from +1.00 to +2.50 D reading add were implanted bilaterally. Assessments at 6 months included uncorrected near, intermediate and distance visual acuities, defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, responses to the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Questionnaire and a Task Assessment Questionnaire.

resultsA total of 34 subjects completed the study. Investigators targeted emmetropia in all eyes. Mean binocular uncorrected near, intermediate and distance visual acuities measured logMAR -0.01 ± 0.05 (20/20), -0.02 ± 0.08 (20/19) and 0.07 ± 0.10 (20/23), respectively. Mean monocular uncorrected near, intermediate and distance visual acuities measured logMAR 0.068 ± 0.09 (20/23), 0.062 ± 0.10 (20/23) and 0.16 ± 0.12 (20/29). There were no clinically or statistically significant differences in contrast sensitivity between baseline and 6 months under any testing conditions. Subjects reported significant improvements in measures of vision-related quality of life and ability to perform tasks at all distances without glasses or contact lenses. Overall, satisfaction with the EDOF ICL was high: postoperatively, 91.2% of subjects were satisfied with their vision.

conclusionThis multicenter, prospective clinical investigation demonstrated the ability of the EDOF ICL to correct myopia and presbyopia, resulting in improvement of uncorrected near, intermediate and distance visual acuity without compromising the quality of vision. The EDOF ICL allowed subjects to perform tasks of daily living without glasses or contact lenses. Subjects reported significant improvements in quality of life with high levels of spectacle independence and satisfaction.

Indexed as

implantable Collamer lensmyopiaphakic refractive lenspresbyopia

Identifiers

PMID32982164
PMCPMC7509320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.