Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32982119›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2020

Efficacy of pancreatoscopy for pancreatic duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Syed M Saghir, Harmeet S Mashiana, Babu P Mohan, Banreet S Dhindsa, Amaninder Dhaliwal, Saurabh Chandan, Neil Bhogal, Ishfaq Bhat, Shailender Singh, Douglas G Adler

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pancreatoscopy-Guided Lithotripsy for Pancreatic Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Chronic Pancreatitis: Role of Endoscopic Procedures.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. [Endoscopic Management of Chronic Pancreatitis].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Mechanism and treatment of pancreatic duct stones.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Review
  8. Pancreatoscopy in the evaluation and management of pancreatic disorders.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  9. Current status and future perspectives for endoscopic treatment of local complications in chronic pancreatitis.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Syed M SaghirDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV 89102, United States.
Harmeet S MashianaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska School of Medicine, Omaha, NE 68198-2000, United States.
Babu P MohanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, United States.
Banreet S DhindsaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV 89102, United States.
Amaninder DhaliwalDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska School of Medicine, Omaha, NE 68198-2000, United States.
Saurabh ChandanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska School of Medicine, Omaha, NE 68198-2000, United States.
Neil BhogalDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska School of Medicine, Omaha, NE 68198-2000, United States.
Ishfaq BhatDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska School of Medicine, Omaha, NE 68198-2000, United States.
Shailender SinghDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska School of Medicine, Omaha, NE 68198-2000, United States.
Douglas G AdlerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, United States. douglas.adler@hsc.utah.edu.
University of Nevada, Las Vegas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic duct stones can lead to significant abdominal pain for patients. Per oral pancreatoscopy (POP)-guided intracorporal lithotripsy is being increasingly used for the management of main pancreatic duct calculi (PDC) in chronic pancreatitis. POP uses two techniques: Electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) and laser lithotripsy (LL). Data on the safety and efficacy are limited for this procedure. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with a primary aim to calculate the pooled technical and clinical success rates of POP. The secondary aim was to assess pooled rates of technical success, clinical success for the two individual techniques, and adverse event rates.

aimTo perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of POP, EHL and LL for management of PDC in chronic pancreatitis.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Google Scholar and Web of Science databases (from 1999 to October 2019) to identify studies with patient age greater than 17 and any gender that reported on outcomes of POP, EHL and LL. The primary outcome assessed involved the pooled technical success and clinical success rate of POP. The secondary outcome included the pooled technical success and clinical success rate for EHL and LL. We also assessed the pooled rate of adverse events for POP, EHL and LL including a subgroup analysis for the rate of adverse event subtypes for POP: Hemorrhage, post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP), perforation, abdominal pain, fever and infections. Technical success was defined as the rate of clearing pancreatic duct stones and clinical success as the improvement in pain. Random-effects model was used for analysis. Heterogeneity between study-specific estimates was calculated using the Cochran

resultsA total of 16 studies including 383 patients met the inclusion criteria. The technical success rate of POP was 76.4% (95%CI: 65.9-84.5;

conclusionOur study highlights the high technical and clinical success rates for POP, EHL and LL. POP-guided lithotripsy could be a viable option for management of chronic pancreatitis with PDC.

Indexed as

CalculiLithotripsyPancreatic DiseasesCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeHumansPancreatic DuctsTreatment OutcomeCalculiChronic pancreatitisElectrohydraulic shockwave lithotripsyEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyExtracorporeal shockwave lithotripsyLaser lithotripsyMeta-analysisOutcomeSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32982119
PMCPMC7495039
OpenAlexW3083884789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.