ArticleSocial indicators research2019
Objective and Subjective Socioeconomic Status, Their Discrepancy, and Health: Evidence from East Asia.
Article in Social indicators research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effects of subjective socioeconomic status and its underestimation on physical activity: evidence from China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Mortality Risk in CKM Stage 0-3 Patients: Analysis of Inflammatory Mediation.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Marital satisfaction and phubbing: the roles of depressive symptoms and subjective social status.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Depression as a mediator between socioeconomic status and risk of All-Cause and cardiovascular mortality in diabetes and prediabetes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Analysis of subjective well-being in European Union countries: Group DEA and NPE.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The association between subjective socioeconomic status and depressive symptoms in women of reproductive age: the chain mediating effects of marital satisfaction and well-being.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- How Does Subjective Social Status Associate With Depression Among the Labor Force Population in China? - Analysis of the Mediation Effect Based on the Sense of Social Equity.International journal of public health · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of dietary patterns and depression risk: significant inverse association with HEI-2015 and mediating role of BMI.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Regional Socioeconomic Deprivation in Germany and Adherence to the 24-h Movement Guidelines among Children and Adolescents.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Influence of education and subjective financial status on dietary habits among young, middle-aged, and older adults in Japan: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2023Article
- The mobility effects hypothesis: Methods and applications.Social science research · 2023Article
- Trajectories of health-related quality of life by change pattern of objective and subjective social status.SSM - population health · 2022Review
- Patient-Reported Roles in Decision-Making Among Asian Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Multicountry Study.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Socioeconomic status (SES) is largely understood to be a fundamental determinant of health. Recently, subjective socioeconomic status (SSS) has emerged as a potentially important predictor of health above and beyond traditional (i.e., objective) SES indicators (OSS). The current study adds to this emerging body of research by examining the potentially important role of status discrepancies for health outcomes. We used nationally representative data from three East Asian countries (China, Japan, and South Korea) (2010 East Asian Social Survey) and a non-linear statistical technique (i.e., diagonal mobility model) to simultaneously model the independent contributions of OSS and SSS and their discrepancy for three health outcomes. Findings showed that SSS does, in fact, explain additional variation in health net of OSS in most cases, and status discrepancy is not associated with any of the three health outcomes. While status discrepancy was not found to be a driving factor in determining the predictive power of SSS net of OSS (at least in East Asia), the present study adds robustness to the accumulating evidence that challenges the social inequality hypothesis and provides a basis from which future research can build and contribute further to the understanding surrounding socioeconomic status and health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.