Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32981945›Full record

ReviewCoordination chemistry reviews2021

Recent advances in process engineering and upcoming applications of metal-organic frameworks.

UnJin Ryu, Seohyeon Jee, Purna Chandra Rao, Jeeyoung Shin, Changhyun Ko, Minyoung Yoon, Kyo Sung Park, Kyung Min Choi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Coordination chemistry reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

UnJin RyuDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Sookmyung Women's University, 100 Cheongpa-ro 47 gil, Yongsan-gu, Seoul 04310, Republic of Korea.
Seohyeon JeeDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Sookmyung Women's University, 100 Cheongpa-ro 47 gil, Yongsan-gu, Seoul 04310, Republic of Korea.
Purna Chandra RaoDepartment of Chemistry & Green-Nano Materials Research Center, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea.
Jeeyoung ShinDepartment of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul 04310, Republic of Korea.
Changhyun KoInstitute of Advanced Materials & Systems, Sookmyung Women's University, 100 Cheongpa-ro 47 gil, Yongsan-gu, Seoul 04310, Republic of Korea.
Minyoung YoonDepartment of Chemistry & Green-Nano Materials Research Center, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea.
Kyo Sung ParkCorporation R&D, Research Park, LG Chem, LG Science Park, 30, Magokjungang-10-Ro, Gangseo-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Min ChoiDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Sookmyung Women's University, 100 Cheongpa-ro 47 gil, Yongsan-gu, Seoul 04310, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) has advanced from fundamental chemistry to engineering processes and applications, resulting in new industrial opportunities. The unique features of MOFs, such as their permanent porosity, high surface area, and structural flexibility, continue to draw industrial interest outside the traditional MOF field, both to solve existing challenges and to create new businesses. In this context, diverse research has been directed toward commercializing MOFs, but such studies have been performed according to a variety of individual goals. Therefore, there have been limited opportunities to share the challenges, goals, and findings with most of the MOF field. In this review, we examine the issues and demands for MOF commercialization and investigate recent advances in MOF process engineering and applications. Specifically, we discuss the criteria for MOF commercialization from the views of stability, producibility, regulations, and production cost. This review covers progress in the mass production and formation of MOFs along with future applications that are not currently well known but have high potential for new areas of MOF commercialization.

Indexed as

2,4-DNT, 2,4-dinitrotoluene4-NP, 4-nitrophenolABS, acrylonitril-butadiene-styreneBET, Brunauer–Emmett–TellerCA, Cellulose-acetateCEES, 2-Chloroethyl ethyl sulfideCIE, Commission international ed’EclairageCNF, Cellulose nanofiberCNG, compressed natural gasCommercializationCVD, Chemical vapor depositionCWA, Chemical warfare agentCWC, Chemical weapons conventionDCP, DiethylchlorophosphonateDDM, n-dodecyl β-D-maltosideDEF, N,N-Diethyl formamideDFP, Diisopropyl fluorophosphateDFT, Density functional theoryDIFP, DiisopropylfluorophosphateDispersionDLS, Dynamic light scatteringDMA, DimethylacetamideDMF, N,N-Dimethyl formamideDMMP, Dimethyl methylphosphonateDRIFTS, Diffuse reflectance infrared fourier transform spectroscopyE. Coli, Escherichia coliECS, Extrusion-crushing-sievingEDLCs, Electrochemical double-layer capacitorsEPA, Environmental protection agencyEXAFS, Extended X-ray absorption fine structureFn, Fusobacterium nucleatumFT-IR, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopyFuture applicationsGC–MS, Gas chromatography–mass spectrometryGRGDS, Gly-Arg-Gly-Asp-SerhXAS, Hard X-ray absorption spectroscopyILDs, Interlayer dielectricsITRS, International technology roadmap for semiconductorsLED, Light-emitting diodeLIBs, Lithium-ion batteriesLMOF, Luminescent metal–organic frameworkLOD, Limit of detectionMass productionMBC, Minimum bactericidal concentrationMB, methylene blueMetal–organic frameworkMIC, Minimum inhibitory concentrationMIM, Metal-insulator–metalMMP, Methyl methylphosphonateMOF, metal–organic frameworkMOGs, Metal-organic gelsMRA, mesoporous ρ-aluminaMRSA, Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureusMVTR, Moisture vapor transport rateNMP, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidoneNMR, Nuclear magnetic resonancePANI, PolyanilinePAN, PolyacrylonitrilePEG-CCM, polyethylene-glycol-modified mono-functional curcuminPEI, PolyetherimidePEMFCs, Proton-exchange membrane fuel cellsPg, Porphyromonas gingivalisPM, Particulate matterPOM, PolyoxometalatePPC, Polypropylene/polycarbonatePSM, Post-synthetic modificationPS, PolystyrenePVA, Polyvinyl alcoholPVB, Polyvinyl ButyralPVC, PolyvinylchloridePVF, PolyvinylformalPXRD, Powder x-ray diffractionRDX, 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazinaneROS, Reactive oxygen speciesSALI, Solvent assisted ligand incorporationSBU, Secondary building unitSCXRD, Single-crystal X-ray diffractionSEM, Scanning electron microscopeShapingSIBs, Sodium-ion batteriesSSEs, Solid-state electrolytesSTY, space–time yield, grams of MOF per cubic meter of reaction mixture per day of synthesissXAS, Soft X-ray absorption spectroscopyTEA, TriethylamineTIPS-HoP, Thermally induced phase separation-hot pressingTNP, 2,4,6-trinitrophenolTNT, 2,4,6-trinitrotolueneUPS, Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopyVOC, Volatile organic compoundWHO, World health organizationWLED, White light emitting diodeXPS, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopyZIF, zeolitic imidazolate framework

Identifiers

PMID32981945
PMCPMC7500364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.