ArticleBMC medical education2020
The role of accreditation in 21st century health professions education: report of an International Consensus Group.
Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Factors influencing the incorporation of Entrustable Professional Activities into assessment in nutrition and dietetics education: A systematic review.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025Pooled it
- Design, delivery and effectiveness of health practitioner regulation systems: an integrative review.Human resources for health · 2023Pooled it
- Merit-based Academic Certification in Andrology: A Groundbreaking Initiative by the Global Andrology Forum.The world journal of men's health · 2026Article
- The impact of managerial styles on medical service quality in Romanian public hospitals: a study of accreditation and performance.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Conceptualising equity in basic medical education accreditation standards: A qualitative study of expert perspectives.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Perspectives on the US Graduate Medical Education Accreditation System in the Context of the Current Policy Climate.Journal of graduate medical education · 2026Article
- Global research agenda for health professionals education: a systematic scoping review.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Developing an Accreditation Framework for Postgraduate Medical Speciality Education in Low-Resource Settings: A Qualitative Study from Sudan.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Systems Thinking: Identifying Leverage Points for Achieving a Continuum of Competency-Based Health Professions Education.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- Competency-based curricula in the Eastern Mediterranean Region schools of pharmacy: a framework-informed mixed method study.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Article
- Program standards and student competencies among global chiropractic accreditation agencies: a content analysis.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Two decades of accreditation in Chilean medical education: outcomes and lessons learned.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Benefits, Challenges, and Opportunities of LCME Accreditation: A National Survey.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Categorising drivers of curriculum renewal in entry-to-practice health professional education: A scoping review.Medical education · 2025Article
- Bridging intentions and outcomes: a program theory approach to residency accreditation standards.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Perceived effects of accreditation on education quality and health-related job outcomes: scales validation and correlates in Lebanon.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Competency-based postgraduate medical education as an institutional initiative in a low- middle-income country: program directors' perceptions of early implementation.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Impacts of the Accreditation Process for Undergraduate Medical Schools: A Scoping Review.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
- Voices on academic accreditation: lived experiences of nurse educators, administrators, students, and alumni in nursing education.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Equity in Basic Medical Education accreditation standards: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccreditation is considered an essential ingredient for an effective system of health professions education (HPE) globally. While accreditation systems exist in various forms worldwide, there has been little written about the contemporary enterprise of accreditation and even less about its role in improving health care outcomes. We set out to 1) identify a global, contemporary definition of accreditation in the health professions, 2) describe the relationship of educational accreditation to health care outcomes, 3) identify important questions and recurring issues in twenty-first century HPE accreditation, and 4) propose a framework of essential ingredients in present-day HPE accreditation.
methodsWe identified health professions accreditation leaders via a literature search and a Google search of HPE institutions, as well as by accessing the networks of other leaders. These leaders were invited to join an international consensus consortium to advance the scholarship and thinking about HPE accreditation. We describe the consensus findings from the International Health Professions Accreditation Outcomes Consortium (IHPAOC).
resultsWe define accreditation as the process of formal evaluation of an educational program, institution, or system against defined standards by an external body for the purposes of quality assurance and enhancement. In the context of HPE, accreditation is distinct from other forms of program evaluation or research. Accreditation can enhance health care outcomes because of its ability to influence and standardize the quality of training programs, continuously enhance curriculum to align with population needs, and improve learning environments. We describe ten fundamental and recurring elements of accreditation systems commonly found in HPE and provide an overview of five emerging developments in accreditation in the health professions based on the consensus findings.
conclusionsAccreditation has taken on greater importance in contemporary HPE. These consensus findings provide frameworks of core elements of accreditation systems and both recurring and emerging design issues. HPE scholars, educators, and leaders can build on these frameworks to advance research, development, and operation of high-quality accreditation systems worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.