Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32981440›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2020

Toxicity of airborne particles-established evidence, knowledge gaps and emerging areas of importance.

Frank J Kelly, Julia C Fussell

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frank J KellyNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Environmental Exposures and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Sir Michael Uren Building, White City Campus, 80-92 Wood Lane, London W12 0BZ, UK.
Julia C FussellNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Environmental Exposures and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Sir Michael Uren Building, White City Campus, 80-92 Wood Lane, London W12 0BZ, UK.
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L01341X/1Medical Research Council MR/S019669/1Medical Research Council MR/S020810/1Medical Research Council MR/S020810/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemiological research has taught us a great deal about the health effects of airborne particulate matter (PM), particularly cardiorespiratory effects of combustion-related particles. This has been matched by toxicological research to define underlying mechanistic pathways. To keep abreast of the substantial challenges that air pollution continues to throw at us requires yet more strides to be achieved. For example, being aware of the most toxic components/sources and having a definitive idea of the range of associated disease outcomes. This review discusses approaches designed to close some of these knowledge gaps. These include a focus on particles arising from non-exhaust PM at the roadside and microplastics-both of which are becoming more relevant in the light of a shift in PM composition in response to global pressure to reduce combustion emissions. The application of hypothesis-free approaches in both mechanistic studies and epidemiology in unveiling unexpected relationships and generating novel insights is also discussed. Previous work, strengthening the evidence for both the adverse effects

Indexed as

Air PollutionEnvironmental MonitoringEpidemiologic StudiesHumansMicroplasticsModels, BiologicalMotor VehiclesParticulate MatterMicroplasticsParticulate Matterepidemiologymetabolomicsmicroplasticsnon-exhaustparticulate mattertoxicology

Identifiers

PMID32981440
PMCPMC7536031
OpenAlexW3088523525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.