Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32981337›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2020

Evidence-Based Policy Making for Public Health Interventions in Cardiovascular Diseases: Formally Assessing the Feasibility of Clinical Trials.

Kathryn Foti, Randi E Foraker, Pamela Martyn-Nemeth, Cheryl A M Anderson, Nancy R Cook, Alice H Lichtenstein, Sarah D de Ferranti, Deborah Rohm Young, Marie-France Hivert, Robert Ross and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Rigorous Policy-Making Amid COVID-19 and Beyond: Literature Review and Critical Insights.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathryn FotiWelch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Baltimore, MD (K.F., L.J.A.).
Randi E ForakerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, MO (R.E.F.).
Pamela Martyn-NemethDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Illinois at Chicago (P.M.-N.).
Cheryl A M AndersonDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (K.F., C.A.M.A., L.J.A.).
Nancy R CookDivision of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (N.R.C.).
Alice H LichtensteinCardiovascular Nutrition Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA (A.H.L.).
Sarah D de FerrantiDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, MA (S.D.d.F.).
Deborah Rohm YoungDivision of Behavioral Research, Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena (D.R.Y.).
Marie-France HivertDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA (M.-F.H.).
Robert RossSchool of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (R.R.).
Prakash DeedwaniaSchool of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, Fresno (P.D.).
Laurie P WhitselDepartment of Policy Research and Translation, American Heart Association, Washington, DC (L.P.W.).
Lawrence J AppelWelch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Baltimore, MD (K.F., L.J.A.).
Johns Hopkins University · USAmerican Heart Association · USBoston Children's Hospital · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USJean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging · USKaiser Permanente · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USQueen's University · CAUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

CARDIOVASCULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY INSTITUTIONAL TRAININGT32HL007024 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Elizabeth Selvin · 1985 to 2026
$17.5M
Research BaseP30DK072488 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI MITCHELL, BRAXTON D, TAYLOR, SIMEON I. · 2005 to 2019
$17.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007024NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementation of prevention policies has often been impeded or delayed due to the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with hard clinical outcomes (eg, incident disease, mortality). Despite the prominent role of RCTs in health care, it may not always be feasible to conduct RCTs of public health interventions with hard outcomes due to logistical and ethical considerations. RCTs may also lack external validity and have limited generalizability. Currently, there is insufficient guidance for policymakers charged with establishing evidence-based policy to determine whether an RCT with hard outcomes is needed before policy recommendations. In this context, the purpose of this article is to assess, in a case study, the feasibility of conducting an RCT of the oft-cited issue of sodium reduction on cardiovascular outcomes and then propose a framework for decision-making, which includes an assessment of the feasibility of conducting an RCT with hard clinical outcomes when such trials are unavailable. We designed and assessed the feasibility of potential individual- and cluster-randomized trials of sodium reduction on cardiovascular outcomes. Based on our assumptions, a trial using any of the designs considered would require tens of thousands of participants and cost hundreds of millions of dollars, which is prohibitively expensive. Our estimates may be conservative given several key challenges, such as the unknown costs of sustaining a long-term difference in sodium intake, the effect of differential cotreatment with antihypertensive medications, and long lag time to clinical outcomes. Thus, it would be extraordinarily difficult to conduct such a trial, and despite the high costs, would still be at substantial risk for a spuriously null result. A robust framework, such as the one we developed, should be used to guide policymakers when establishing evidence-based public health interventions in the absence of trials with hard clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Diet, Sodium-RestrictedEvidence-Based MedicinePolicy MakingPreventive Health ServicesPublic HealthRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignRisk Reduction BehaviorCardiovascular DiseasesFeasibility StudiesHumansTreatment Outcomecardiovascular diseasedecision-makingpolicypreventionpublic healthrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID32981337
PMCPMC7674216
OpenAlexW3088950483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.