Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32981077›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2020

Spaceflight induces oxidative damage to blood-brain barrier integrity in a mouse model.

Xiao W Mao, Nina C Nishiyama, Stephanie D Byrum, Seta Stanbouly, Tamako Jones, Jacob Holley, Vijayalakshmi Sridharan, Marjan Boerma, Alan J Tackett, Jeffrey S Willey and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Potential biological mechanisms underlying spaceflight-induced depression symptoms in astronauts].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Xiao W MaoDepartment of Basic Sciences, Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences (BMES), Loma Linda University School of Medicine and Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Nina C NishiyamaDepartment of Basic Sciences, Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences (BMES), Loma Linda University School of Medicine and Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Stephanie D ByrumDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Seta StanboulyDepartment of Basic Sciences, Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences (BMES), Loma Linda University School of Medicine and Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Tamako JonesDepartment of Basic Sciences, Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences (BMES), Loma Linda University School of Medicine and Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Jacob HolleyDepartment of Basic Sciences, Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences (BMES), Loma Linda University School of Medicine and Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Vijayalakshmi SridharanDivision of Radiation Health, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Marjan BoermaDivision of Radiation Health, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Alan J TackettDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Jeffrey S WilleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Michael J PecautDepartment of Basic Sciences, Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences (BMES), Loma Linda University School of Medicine and Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Michael D DelpDepartment of Nutrition, Food and Exercise Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Loma Linda University · USLoma Linda University Medical Center · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USArkansas Children's Hospital · USFlorida State University · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Translational Regulation in Normal Erythropoiesis and Diamond Blackfan AnemiaP20GM121293 · NIGMS · ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL RES INST · PI Alan Tackett · 2017 to 2026
$27.6M
NASA NNX15AB41GNIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many factors contribute to the health risks encountered by astronauts on missions outside Earth's atmosphere. Spaceflight-induced potential adverse neurovascular damage and late neurodegeneration are a chief concern. The goal of the present study was to characterize the effects of spaceflight on oxidative damage in the mouse brain and its impact on blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity. Ten-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were launched to the International Space Station (ISS) for 35 days as part of Space-X 12 mission. Ground control (GC) mice were maintained on Earth in flight hardware cages. Within 38 ± 4 hours after returning from the ISS, mice were euthanized and brain tissues were collected for analysis. Quantitative assessment of brain tissue demonstrated that spaceflight caused an up to 2.2-fold increase in apoptosis in the hippocampus compared to the control group. Immunohistochemical analysis of the mouse brain revealed an increased expression of aquaporin4 (AQP4) in the flight hippocampus compared to the controls. There was also a significant increase in the expression of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) and a decrease in the expression of the BBB-related tight junction protein, Zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1). These results indicate a disturbance of BBB integrity. Quantitative proteomic analysis showed significant alterations in pathways responsible for neurovascular integrity, mitochondrial function, neuronal structure, protein/organelle transport, and metabolism in the brain after spaceflight. Changes in pathways associated with adhesion and molecular remodeling were also documented. These data indicate that long-term spaceflight may have pathological and functional consequences associated with neurovascular damage and late neurodegeneration.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsApoptosisBiological TransportBlood-Brain BarrierBrainMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMitochondriaOxidative StressProteomeSpace FlightWeightlessnessProteomeblood-brain barrierbrain tissuemicrogravityneurodegenerationproteomicsspaceflight

Identifiers

PMID32981077
PMCPMC8191453
OpenAlexW3089158732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.