Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32981038›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2020

Deterministic linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for patient-specific CT dose estimation: Comparison against a Monte Carlo benchmark for realistic scanner configurations and patient models.

Sara Principi, Adam Wang, Alexander Maslowski, Todd Wareing, Petr Jordan, Taly Gilat Schmidt

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Monte Carlo methods for medical imaging research.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sara PrincipiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin and Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA.
Adam WangDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Alexander MaslowskiVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Todd WareingVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Petr JordanVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
Taly Gilat SchmidtDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin and Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA.
Varian Medical Systems (United States) · USMarquette University · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USStanford University · US

Funding

Software tool for routine, rapid, patient-specific CT organ dose estimationU01EB023822 · NIBIB · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHMIDT, TALY GILAT, VAN HETEREN, JOHN · 2017 to 2020
$2.1M
HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) U01EB023822NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB023822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEpidemiological evidence suggests an increased risk of cancer related to computed tomography (CT) scans, with children exposed to greater risk. The purpose of this work is to test the reliability of a linear Boltzmann transport equation (LBTE) solver for rapid and patient-specific CT dose estimation. This includes building a flexible LBTE framework for modeling modern clinical CT scanners and to validate the resulting dose maps across a range of realistic scanner configurations and patient models.

methodsIn this study, computational tools were developed for modeling CT scanners, including a bowtie filter, overrange collimation, and tube current modulation. The LBTE solver requires discretization in the spatial, angular, and spectral dimensions, which may affect the accuracy of scanner modeling. To investigate these effects, this study evaluated the LBTE dose accuracy for different discretization parameters, scanner configurations, and patient models (male, female, adults, pediatric). The method used to validate the LBTE dose maps was the Monte Carlo code Geant4, which provided ground truth dose maps. LBTE simulations were implemented on a GeForce GTX 1080 graphic unit, while Geant4 was implemented on a distributed cluster of CPUs.

resultsThe agreement between Geant4 and the LBTE solver quantifies the accuracy of the LBTE, which was similar across the different protocols and phantoms. The results suggest that 18 views per rotation provides sufficient accuracy, as no significant improvement in the accuracy was observed by increasing the number of projection views. Considering this discretization, the LBTE solver average simulation time was approximately 30 s. However, in the LBTE solver the phantom model was implemented with a lower voxel resolution with respect to Geant4, as it is limited by the memory of the GPU. Despite this discretization, the results showed a good agreement between the LBTE and Geant4, with root mean square error of the dose in organs of approximately 3.5% for most of the studied configurations.

conclusionsThe LBTE solver is proposed as an alternative to Monte Carlo for patient-specific organ dose estimation. This study demonstrated accurate organ dose estimates for the rapid LBTE solver when considering realistic aspects of CT scanners and a range of phantom models. Future plans will combine the LBTE framework with deep learning autosegmentation algorithms to provide near real-time patient-specific organ dose estimation.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleMonte Carlo MethodPhantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageReproducibility of ResultsCT organ dosedeterministic solverMonte Carlo

Identifiers

PMID32981038
PMCPMC7837758
OpenAlexW3088451136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.