Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32981000›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2020

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS): a Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) in Bariatric Surgery.

Amilcare Parisi, Jacopo Desiderio, Roberto Cirocchi, Stefano Trastulli

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Enhanced recovery after surgery-Does the ERAS concept keep its promises].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amilcare ParisiDepartment of Emergency and Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, 05100, Terni, Italy.
Jacopo DesiderioDepartment of Emergency and Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, 05100, Terni, Italy.
Roberto CirocchiDepartment of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, St. Mary's Hospital, 05100, Terni, Italy.
Stefano TrastulliDepartment of Emergency and Digestive Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, 05100, Terni, Italy. stefano.trastulli@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4522-6551
Santa Maria Nuova Hospital · ITUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur aim was to conduct an up-to-date systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the benefits and harms of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme in bariatric surgery.

methodsMEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs on ERAS versus standard care (SC) until April 2020. The primary endpoint was the length of hospital stay (LOS).

resultsFive RCTs included a total of 610 procedures. ERAS adoption is capable of significantly reducing LOS (MD of - 0.51; 95% CI - 0.92 to - 0.10; P = 0.01) and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.95; P = 0.04). No significant differences in terms of adverse events and readmissions.

conclusionsThe implementation of ERAS in bariatric surgery produces a significant reduction in LOS and PONV.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryObesity, MorbidHumansLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative Nausea and VomitingBariatric surgeryEnhanced recovery aftersurgeryERASgastric bypassMeta-analysisMetabolic surgeryRandomised controlled trialsSleeve gastrectomySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32981000
OpenAlexW3087782262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.