Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32980982›Full record

Trial reportMusculoskeletal surgery2022

Continuous adductor canal block is superior to adductor canal block alone or adductor canal block combined with IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of knee) in postoperative analgesia and ambulation following total knee arthroplasty: randomized control trial.

R Tak, A V Gurava Reddy, K Jhakotia, K Karumuri, S R Sankineani

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R TakDepartment of Orthopaedics and Joint Replacement, Sunshine Hospital, Penderghast Road, Secunderabad, Telangana, 500003, India.
A V Gurava ReddyDepartment of Orthopaedics and Joint Replacement, Sunshine Hospital, Penderghast Road, Secunderabad, Telangana, 500003, India.
K JhakotiaDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, Sunshine Hospital, Penderghast Road, Secunderabad, Telangana, 500003, India.
K KarumuriDepartment of Orthopaedics and Joint Replacement, Sunshine Hospital, Penderghast Road, Secunderabad, Telangana, 500003, India.
S R SankineaniDepartment of Orthopaedics and Joint Replacement, Sunshine Hospital, Penderghast Road, Secunderabad, Telangana, 500003, India. sukeshrao.sankineni@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7281-2241
Sunshine Hospitals · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundACB is given as single injection or as continuous block or combined with IPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule of knee) to reduce postoperative knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to evaluate the technique of ACB that is superior in controlling postoperative pain, decrease opioid consumption and facilitate ambulation in the immediate postoperative period.

methodsA total of 171 patients were analyzed from a group of 180 patients who were randomized into three groups: (1) ACB alone, (2) continuous ACB infusion via catheter (CACB) and (3) ACB combined with IPACK. The primary outcome was pain at rest and after ambulation measured by VAS scale every 8 h till 48 h after surgery. The secondary outcome measures were opioid consumption in morphine equivalents, ambulation distance measured in feet on postoperative day 2, timed up and go test, 30 s chair stand test, sitting active extension lag test and maximal knee flexion at discharge.

resultsVAS score at rest and after ambulation, opioid consumption was significantly lower (p < 0.05%) in CACB group compared to other study groups. Similarly, patients in CACB showed significantly (p < 0.05%) better results in the secondary outcome measures. There were no significant differences in the outcomes between ACB and ACB combined with IPACK.

conclusionCACB allows better pain control and less opioid consumption in the immediate postoperative period after TKA compared to ACB alone or ACB with IPACK resulting in better ambulation and rehabilitation. Clinical Trial Registration Number CTRI/2019/03/018239 registered on March 25, 2019.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeNerve BlockAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalHumansPopliteal ArteryPostoperative PainPostural BalanceProspective StudiesTime and Motion StudiesWalkingAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalContinuous ACBIPACKPerineural cathetersTKA

Identifiers

PMID32980982
OpenAlexW3088934869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.