ArticleJournal of neurology2021
Cricopharyngeal bar on videofluoroscopy: high specificity for inclusion body myositis.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inclusion Body Myositis with Isolated Dysphagia: An Earlier-stage Diagnosis Using a Surgical Specimen from Cricopharyngeal Myotomy.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Dysphagia in Myositis and Muscular Dystrophy Using Real-Time MRI and Quantitative Muscle Ultrasound.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Article
- Differentiating Inclusion Body Myositis From Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Based on the Features of Dysphagia: Insights From a Patient With Rapidly Progressive Dysphagia.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Retrograde Cricopharyngeal Dysfunction: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Efficacy of endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy using a curved rigid laryngoscope in patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis: four retrospective case reviews.Nagoya journal of medical science · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the prevalence and characteristics of the cricopharyngeal bar (CPB), defined as marked protrusion with lacking relaxation and stricture of the upper esophageal sphincter on videofluoroscopy, in patients with inclusion body myositis (IBM).
methodsWe conducted a case-control study of comprehensive series of adult healthy individuals and consecutive patients with neuropsychiatric disorders aged over 45 (52 versus 2486). A standard videofluoroscopy was performed.
resultsOverall, 47 individuals with CPB were identified. Of the individuals with CPB, 36% were IBM followed by neurodegenerative disorders, muscular disorders, neuromuscular disorders, and others (32%, 21%, 2.1%, and 8.5%, respectively), indicating the heterogeneity of the etiologies. Against muscular disorders, the sensitivity and specificity of the CPB for IBM were 33% (= 17/52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 20-45%) and 96% (= 264/274; 95% CI, 94-99%), respectively. IBM with CPB showed a higher frequency of obstruction-related dysphagia (88% versus 22%, p < 0.001) and severe CPB (76% versus 23%, p < 0.001) than the control with one. The ratio of the upper esophageal distance at the maximum distension at the level of C6 to that of C4 was lower in IBM with CPB than in the controls with one (0.50 versus 0.77, p < 0.001), which suggests the insufficient opening of the upper esophageal sphincter.
conclusionA CPB could be indicative of IBM. The upper esophagus in IBM with CPB became narrow, like a bottleneck. We provide new perspectives of dysphagia diagnosis by videofluoroscopy, especially for IBM-associated dysphagia, to expand the knowledge on the CPB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.