ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2022
Return on Investment of a Breast Cancer Screening Program in Tanzania: Opportunity for Patient and Public Education.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of Graduate Student Success from an R25 Cancer Research Training in Unique Populations.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025Article
- Sentiment analysis of cancer screening in Chinese social media: Qualitative studies based on machine learning.PloS one · 2025Article
- Strengthening uptake of breast cancer screening services in Tanzania; re-visiting the breast cancer screening messages.BMC cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is the second incident and second cause of cancer mortality among women in Tanzania due to late-stage presentation. The screening clinic at the Ocean Road Cancer Institute (ORCI) can help detect cases early and reduce cost of treatment. We calculated the return on investment (ROI) of the ORCI breast screening clinic. Screening and treatment data of all newly diagnosed breast cancer patients seen at ORCI during 2016-2018 were abstracted from the medical records. Also, data on time, resources, and cost of screening and treatment were obtained. The cost of treating screened patients was compared with cost of treating unscreened patients, and differences in cost of treatment were compared with cost of operating the screening program. Of the 730 total patients, 58 were screened prior to treatment, and 672 were not. There was no significant difference between stage at diagnosis and treatments received by screened and unscreened patients (79.3% late- stage vs 72.2% late-stage diagnosis, respectively (p = .531), or cost of treatment between the two groups (cost, in Tanzanian Shillings, for screened (2,167,155.14 or $954.27) vs unscreened (1,918,592.28 or $844.52), (p = .355). There was also no significant difference in cost of treatment between the screened and unscreened groups and a slightly negative ROI (- 0.05%) from implementing the program. The breast screening clinic in Tanzania has not yet proven its cost-effectiveness in reducing stage with screening. The likelihood that patients have utilized the clinic for treatment rather than early detection is a possible reason for the lack of cost-effectiveness. Future studies should focus on educational initiatives to encourage screening at early disease stage. Public education should increase awareness about the clinic for early detection. The experience of this program is ideal for dissemination to other low-income countries that are initiating cancer early detection and cancer education programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.