Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32980972›Full record

Observational studyUrolithiasis2021

CT-related parameters and Framingham score as predictors of spontaneous passage of ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm: results from a prospective, observational, multicenter study.

Ismail Selvi, Numan Baydilli, Turgut Tursem Tokmak, Emre Can Akinsal, Halil Basar

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Urolithiasis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Does volume matter? Incorporating estimated stone volume in a nomogram to predict ureteral stone passage.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ismail SelviDepartment of Urology, Karabük University Training and Research Hospital, Karabük, Turkey. ismselvi33@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3578-0732
Numan BaydilliDepartment of Urology, Erciyes University Medical School, Kayseri, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1017-3653
Turgut Tursem TokmakDepartment of Radiology, Kayseri City Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1952-9911
Emre Can AkinsalDepartment of Urology, Erciyes University Medical School, Kayseri, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0809-9952
Halil BasarDepartment of Urology, Health Science University Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1770-5165
Erciyes University · TRAnkara Onkoloji Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRKarabük University · TRKayseri Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the reliability of newly defined CT-related parameters and cardiovascular risk factors in groups adjusted for stone size and location to predict spontaneous stone passage (SP) of uncomplicated ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm. The data of 280 adult patients with solitary unilateral ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm in diameter in non-contrast computed tomography were prospectively recorded. All patients undergoing a four-week observation protocol with medical expulsive therapy using tamsulosin were divided into two groups according to SP or no SP. Demographic, clinical and radiological findings of these groups were recorded. Spontaneous stone passage was observed in 176 (62.9%) of the patients, whereas the SP rate was 57.6% for 118 upper ureteral stones and 66.7% for 162 lower ureteral stones. The SP rate was 13.3 times greater with ureteral wall thickness < 1.88 mm, 4.4 times greater with a ratio of ureter to stone diameter of < 1.24, 3.4 times greater with Framingham score of < 11.5%, 2 times greater with neutrophil lymphocyte ratio < 1.96, 1.9 times greater with ureteral diameter < 6.33 mm and 1.5 times greater with stone volume < 38.54 mm

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexTamsulosinTreatment OutcomeUreterTamsulosinUrological AgentsFramingham risk scoreNeutrophil lymphocyte ratioSpontaneous stone passageUreteral diameterUreteral stoneUreteral wall thickness

Identifiers

PMID32980972
OpenAlexW3088039926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.