Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32980964›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2021

Satisfactory short-term outcome of total laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal in obese patients: a comparative study with open techniques.

Hao Su, Shou Luo, Zheng Xu, Chuanduo Zhao, Mandula Bao, Xishan Wang, Zhixiang Zhou, Haitao Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosisWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. LaparoscopicWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hao SuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China.
Shou LuoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China.
Zheng XuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China.
Chuanduo ZhaoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China.
Mandula BaoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China.
Xishan WangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China.
Zhixiang ZhouDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China. zhouzhixiangdoctor@126.com.
Haitao ZhouDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, People's Republic of China. zhouhaitao01745@163.com.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Initiative for Innovative Medicine t CAMS-2017-I2M-4-002Postgraduate Innovation Fund Project of Peking Union Medical College in 2018 2018-1002-02-26
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reversal of loop ileostomy after colorectal surgery in obese patients can be challenging and total laparoscopic (TLAP) approach may be beneficial. This study aims to compare short-term outcomes of TLAP and open approaches in obese patients undergoing loop ileostomy reversal after laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery. A retrospective review was performed for consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery previously and underwent loop ileostomy reversal between January 2017 and April 2020. TLAP and open cases performed in obese patients were identified and compared for the following outcomes: baseline characteristics, operative outcomes, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications. TLAP or open-loop ileostomy reversal was performed on 30 and 34 patients, respectively. TLAP approach was associated with a similar operation time and blood loss compared with an open approach (P > 0.05). The median length of incision for stoma removal was significantly shorter in the TLAP group than in the open group (6.5 cm vs. 8.5 cm; P < 0.05), and a lower incidence of incisional infection was also noted in the TLAP group (6.7% vs. 26.5%; P < 0.05). The groups were comparable as regards the time to ground activities and length of hospitalization (P > 0.05), but the time to first flatus was decreased (2.0 vs. 3.0 days; P < 0.05). This retrospective study demonstrated that TLAP loop ileostomy reversal may have a satisfactory short-term outcome for obese patients after laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery, with a shorter incisional length and a lower incidence of incisional infection as well as an earlier time to first flatus.

Indexed as

LaparoscopySurgical StomasHumansIleostomyObesityPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeColorectalIleostomyObesityOpenTotal laparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID32980964
OpenAlexW3089118565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.