Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32980901›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical science2020

High-quality Cleavage Embryo versus Low-quality Blastocyst in Frozen-thawed Cycles: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes.

Yu-Lan Wei, Bo Huang, Xin-Ling Ren, Lei Jin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Development of a Novel Nomogram Based on Ultrasonic Radiomics for Predicting Intrauterine Pregnancy After Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycle.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu-Lan WeiReproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Bo HuangReproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Xin-Ling RenReproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Lei JinReproductive Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. leijintongjih@qq.com.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNTongji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the clinical outcomes of the frozen-thawed cycles of high-quality cleavage embryos with low-quality blastocysts to provide a reference for the choice of frozen-thawed embryo transfer schemes and to improve clinical pregnancy rates. A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer at the Reproductive Medicine Center of Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from 2016 to 2017. In total, 845 cases were divided into a high-quality cleavage embryo group (group A) and a low-quality blastocyst group (group B). Each group was further divided into subgroups based on the number of transplants. Group A was categorized into two subgroups comprising of 94 cases in subgroup A1 (1 high-quality 8-cell group) and 201 cases in subgroup A2 (2 high-quality 8-cell group). Group B was divided into four subgroups consisting of 73 cases in subgroup B1 (D53BC group), 65 cases in subgroup B2 (D54BC group), 110 cases in subgroup B3 (D63BC group), and 282 cases in subgroup B4 (D64BC group). The pregnancy outcomes and neonatal outcomes between the groups were compared. The clinical pregnancy rates (56.72% and 60.00%) and live birth rates (47.76% and 46.15%) in subgroups A2 and B2 showed no significant differences, but these rates were significantly higher in subgroups A2 and B2 than in the rest subgroups (P<0.05). The multiple birth rate (26.32%) in the subgroup A2 was significantly higher than that in the rest subgroups (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the abortion rates among all groups (P>0.05). In terms of neonatal outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of premature births, sex ratios, and birth defects among the low-weight and gigantic infants (P>0.05). Transplanting two high-quality cleavage embryos during the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles could significantly increase clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates, but at the same time, it also increased the risks of multiple births and complications to mothers and infants. The D54BC subgroup had the most significant advantages among all groups (P<0.05). The rest low-quality blastocysts had clinical outcomes similar to the single high-quality cleavage embryo group.

Indexed as

Fertilization in VitroPregnancy RateAdultBirth RateBlastocystCleavage Stage, OvumEmbryo TransferFemaleFreezingHumansLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy, MultiplePregnancy Outcomeclinical outcomesfrozen-thawed transplantationhigh-quality cleavage embryoslow-quality blastocysts

Identifiers

PMID32980901
OpenAlexW3088814771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.