Author's response to the letter of the editor regarding the "Review of surgical techniques and guide for decision making in the treatment of benign parotid tumors".

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Utility of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in parotid pleomorphic adenoma diagnosis and management.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2024
   Article
2. Minimaly invasive benign parotid surgery in selected patients: An adaptation example to compensate for COVID19 backlog or new era?Oral oncology · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Regarding the "Review of surgical techniques and guide for decision making in the treatment of benign parotid tumors".2020
• Comment on
  Review of surgical techniques and guide for decision making in the treatment of benign parotid tumors.2021

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as