Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32980887›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2021

High degree of consensus achieved regarding diagnosis and treatment of acromioclavicular joint instability among ESA-ESSKA members.

Claudio Rosso, Frank Martetschläger, Maristella F Saccomanno, Andreas Voss, Lucca Lacheta, ESA DELPHI Consensus Panel, Knut Beitzel, Giuseppe Milano

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus StatementSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 6 countries.

Claudio Rosso *ARTHRO Medics, Shoulder and Elbow Center, Thannerstrasse 45, 4054, Basel, Switzerland. C.Rosso@arthro.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2846-6999
Frank Martetschläger *German Center of Shoulder Surgery, ATOS Clinic Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1027-8893
Maristella F SaccomannoOrthopaedics Institute, Fondazione Policilinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7399-8762
Andreas VossDepartment of Sports Orthopedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7047-918X
Lucca LachetaDepartment of Sports Orthopedics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5422-4411
ESA DELPHI Consensus Panel
Knut Beitzel *European Shoulder Associates, European Society of Sport Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy, ESSKA, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4829-7347
Giuseppe Milano *European Shoulder Associates, European Society of Sport Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy, ESSKA, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6040-9623
European Society of Radiology · ATAtos (France) · FRUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a consensus on diagnosis and treatment of acromioclavicular joint instability.

methodsA consensus process following the modified Delphi technique was conducted. Panel members were selected among the European Shoulder Associates of ESSKA. Five rounds were performed between October 2018 and November 2019. The first round consisted of gathering questions which were then divided into blocks referring to imaging, classifications, surgical approach for acute and chronic cases, conservative treatment. Subsequent rounds consisted of condensation by means of an online questionnaire. Consensus was achieved when ≥ 66.7% of the participants agreed on one answer. Descriptive statistic was used to summarize the data.

resultsA consensus was reached on the following topics. Imaging: a true anteroposterior or a bilateral Zanca view are sufficient for diagnosis. 93% of the panel agreed on clinical override testing during body cross test to identify horizontal instability. The Rockwood classification, as modified by the ISAKOS statement, was deemed valid. The separation line between acute and chronic cases was set at 3 weeks. The panel agreed on arthroscopically assisted anatomic reconstruction using a suspensory device (86.2%), with no need of a biological augmentation (82.8%) in acute injuries, whereas biological reconstruction of coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments with tendon graft was suggested in chronic cases. Conservative approach and postoperative care were found similar

conclusionA consensus was found on the main topics of controversy in the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Each step of the diagnostic treatment algorithm was fully investigated and clarified. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Indexed as

Acromioclavicular JointAlgorithmsConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansJoint DislocationsJoint InstabilityLigaments, ArticularOrthopedic ProceduresPostoperative CareRadiographyShoulder DislocationSurveys and QuestionnairesAc jointAc joint instabilityAcromioclavicular jointConsensusDelphiDiagnosisEuropean shoulder associatesInstabilityTreatment

Identifiers

PMID32980887
PMCPMC8225517
OpenAlexW3087914757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.