Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32980697›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2020

Deep learning radiomics of ultrasonography: Identifying the risk of axillary non-sentinel lymph node involvement in primary breast cancer.

Xu Guo, Zhenyu Liu, Caixia Sun, Lei Zhang, Ying Wang, Ziyao Li, Jiaxin Shi, Tong Wu, Hao Cui, Jing Zhang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xu GuoDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China; CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhenyu LiuCAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Caixia SunCAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Beijing Advanced Innovation Centre for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Lei ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Ying WangDepartment of general surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Ziyao LiDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Jiaxin ShiDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Tong WuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Hao CuiDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Jing ZhangDepartment of MRI Diagnosis, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Jie TianCAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Beijing Advanced Innovation Centre for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China; Engineering Research Center of Molecular and Neuro Imaging of Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shanxi, China; School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Beihang University, Beijing, China. Electronic address: jie.tian@ia.ac.cn.
Jiawei TianDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China. Electronic address: jwtian2004@163.com.
Harbin Medical University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNHebei Medical University · CNXidian University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompletion axillary lymph node dissection is overtreatment for patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in whom the metastatic risk of residual non-SLN (NSLN) is low. However, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network panel posits that none of the previous studies has successfully identified such subset patients. Here, we develop a multicentre deep learning radiomics of ultrasonography model (DLRU) to predict the risk of SLN and NSLN metastasis.

methodsIn total, 937 eligible breast cancer patients with ultrasound images were enrolled from two hospitals as the training set (n = 542) and independent test set (n = 395) respectively. Using the images, we developed and validated a prediction model combined with deep learning radiomics and axillary ultrasound to sequentially identify the metastatic risk of SLN and NSLN, thereby, classifying patients to relevant axillary management groups.

findingsIn the test set, the DLRU yields the best performance in identifying patients with metastatic disease in SLNs (sensitivity=98.4%, 95% CI 96.6-100) and NSLNs (sensitivity=98.4%, 95% CI 95.6-99.9). The DLRU also accurately stratifies patients without metastasis in SLN or NSLN into the corresponding low-risk (LR)-SLN and high-risk (HR)-SLN&LR-NSLN category with the negative predictive value of 97% (95% CI 94.2-100) and 91.7% (95% CI 88.8-97.9), respectively. Moreover, compared with the current clinical management, DLRU appropriately assigned 51% (39.6%/77.4%) of overtreated patients in the entire study cohort into the LR group, perhaps avoiding overtreatment.

interpretationThe performance of the DLRU indicates that it may offer a simple preoperative tool to promote personalized axillary management of breast cancer.

fundingThe National Nature Science Foundation of China; The National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China; The Scientific research project of Heilongjiang Health Committee; The Postgraduate Research &Practice Innovation Program of Harbin Medical University.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedUltrasonographyAdultAgedAxillaBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicRetrospective StudiesROC CurveAxillary managementDeep learning radiomicsNSLN metastasis in the axillaPrimary breast cancerUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID32980697
PMCPMC7519251
OpenAlexW3088669171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.