Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32980599›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage. Clinical2020

What do we know about pre- and postoperative plasticity in patients with glioma? A review of neuroimaging and intraoperative mapping studies.

Elisa Cargnelutti, Tamara Ius, Miran Skrap, Barbara Tomasino

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07471100 (Neuromodulation-Induced-Cortical-Prehabilitation In High Grade Glioma Close To The Motor Pathway), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07471100 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Neuromodulation-Induced-Cortical-Prehabilitation In High Grade Glioma Close To The Motor Pathway: Analysis Of The Cortical Brain Plasticity Through Navigated Transacranial Magnetic Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Sanitaria dell'Alto AdigeRan2026 to 2030Enrolled63ConditionsBrain Tumor Adult, Glioma, Glioma, High GradeArmsPhysical Therapy, Combined Therapy Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elisa CargneluttiScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Dipartimento/Unità Operativa Pasian di Prato, Udine, Italy.
Tamara IusSOC Neurochirurgia, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale ASU FC, Italy.
Miran SkrapSOC Neurochirurgia, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale ASU FC, Italy.
Barbara TomasinoScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, Dipartimento/Unità Operativa Pasian di Prato, Udine, Italy. Electronic address: barbara.tomasino@lanostrafamiglia.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain plasticity potential is a central theme in neuro-oncology and is currently receiving increased attention. Advances in treatment have prolonged life expectancy in neuro-oncological patients and the long-term preservation of their quality of life is, therefore, a new challenge. To this end, a better understanding of brain plasticity mechanisms is vital as it can help prevent permanent deficits following neurosurgery. Indeed, reorganization processes can be fundamental to prevent or recover neurological and cognitive deficits by reallocating brain functions outside the lesioned areas. According to more recent studies in the literature, brain reorganization taking place following neurosurgery is associated with good neurofunctioning at follow-up. Interestingly, in the last few years, the number of reports on plasticity has notably increased. Aim of the current review was to provide a comprehensive overview of pre- and postoperative neuroplasticity patterns. Within this framework, we aimed to shed light on some tricky issues, including i) involvement of the contralateral healthy hemisphere, ii) role and potential changes of white matter and connectivity patterns, and iii) reorganization in low- versus high-grade gliomas. We finally discussed the practical implications of these aspects and role of additional potentially relevant factors to be explored. Final purpose was to provide a guideline helpful in promoting increase in the extent of tumor resection while preserving the patients' neurological and cognitive functioning.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaBrain MappingHumansNeuroimagingNeuronal PlasticityNeurosurgical ProceduresQuality of LifeContralesional hemisphereGliomaPostoperative plasticityPreoperative plasticityWhite matter and connectivity

Identifiers

PMID32980599
PMCPMC7522801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.