Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32980254›Full record

ArticleJoint Commission journal on quality and patient safety2020

What Safety Events Are Reported For Ambulatory Care? Analysis of Incident Reports from a Patient Safety Organization.

Anjana E Sharma, Janine Yang, Jan Bing Del Rosario, Mekhala Hoskote, Natalie A Rivadeneira, Stakeholder Research Advisory Council, Urmimala Sarkar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Patient Safety Event Risk and Language Barriers: A Scoping Review.Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety · 2025
    Article
  3. Patient Information Needs During Ambulatory Medication Changes: A Qualitative Study.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Is primary care a patient-safe setting? Prevalence, severity, nature, and causes of adverse events: numerous and mostly avoidable.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anjana E Sharma
Janine Yang
Jan Bing Del Rosario
Mekhala Hoskote
Natalie A Rivadeneira
Stakeholder Research Advisory Council
Urmimala Sarkar

Funding

Institutional Career Development Core SupplementKL2TR001870 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KANAYA, ALKA M., SARKAR, URMIMALA · 2016 to 2025
$19.7M
UCLA Summer Research Training in Aging for Medical Stud*T35AG026736 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Cathy Lee, John C Newman · 2005 to 2026
$3.0M
Improving Survivorship Care for Diverse Cancer Patients Cared for in Safety-net SettingsK24CA212294 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SARKAR, URMIMALA · 2017 to 2021
$831k
Measuring and Improving Ambulatory Patient Safety with an Electronic DashboardR21HS021322 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SARKAR, URMIMALA · 2012 to 2013
$297k
AHRQ HHS R21 HS021322NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001870NCI NIH HHS K24 CA212294NIA NIH HHS T35 AG026736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth care staff document patient safety events using incident reporting systems, which are compiled within Patient Safety Organization databases. Researchers sought to describe the patterns and characteristics of incident reporting behaviors for ambulatory care from in-situ reporting systems from the United States.

methodsThe team analyzed safety reports in ambulatory settings collected from a Patient Safety Organization comprising 400 hospital members in 10 states, from May 2012 to October 2018. All events involving moderate harm, severe harm, and death were included, as well as subsamples of events with missing harm, no harm, and mild harm. The team deductively coded incident types and if patient or caregiver challenges were involved. A multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify predictors of higher harm (severe harm and death) among safety events reported.

resultsOf 2,701 events, there were 51 deaths, 159 severe harm events, 1,180 moderate harm, 926 mild harm, 384 no harm, and 1 unknown. Most were from outpatient subspecialty care, while 5.2% were from home/community, and 2.1% were from primary care. Medication-related events were most common (45.3%). In multivariate analysis, diagnostic errors (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 11.5), patient/caregiver challenges (aOR 2.2), and events in the home/community (aOR 2.0) and in psychiatric settings (aOR 5.0) were associated with higher harm.

conclusionOutpatient reporting systems are limited for primary care and home/community settings, but ambulatory care systems report more harmful events related to diagnosis and patient and caregiver challenges. Improved standardization of reporting, focus on diagnosis, and novel approaches of safety reporting that engage patients will be necessary to improve capture of preventable events affecting patients and to develop system-level solutions.

Identifiers

PMID32980254
PMCPMC7938864
OpenAlexW3081027602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.