COVID19 - Why open and honest public dialogue is needed.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Threats to public health workers.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2023
   Article
2. Digital Public Health Solutions in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Analysis of Contact Tracing Solutions Deployed in Japan and Germany.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
   Article
3. Should lockdown be based on age rather than geography?Public health · 2021
   Article
4. COVID-19-why open and honest public dialogue is needed: Porter's reflections on the ethical dilemmas of age rather than geographical based lockdowns are noteworthy.Public health · 2021
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Should lockdown be based on age rather than geography?2021
• Commented on by
  COVID-19-why open and honest public dialogue is needed: Porter's reflections on the ethical dilemmas of age rather than geographical based lockdowns are noteworthy.2021

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.