Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32979691›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2021

Optimizing screening for depression, anxiety disorders, and post-traumatic stress disorder in inpatient addiction treatment: A preliminary investigation.

E E Levitt, S K Syan, S Sousa, M J Costello, B Rush, A V Samokhvalov, R E McCabe, J Kelly, J MacKillop

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of participation in a large, online community for substance use disorder recovery: A naturalistic, longitudinal study.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rasch analysis of DSM-5 alcohol use disorder in a large inpatient sample.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Initial insights from a quality improvement initiative to develop an evidence-informed young adult substance use program.Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent · 2023
    Article
  11. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist for DSM-5: A Systematic Review of Existing Psychometric Evidence.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2023
    Article
  12. Hazardous drinking and alcohol use disorders.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

E E LevittPeter Boris Centre for Addiction Research, McMaster University & St. Joseph's Health Care, Hamilton, Canada; Homewood Research Institute, Guelph, Canada.
S K SyanPeter Boris Centre for Addiction Research, McMaster University & St. Joseph's Health Care, Hamilton, Canada; Homewood Research Institute, Guelph, Canada.
S SousaHomewood Research Institute, Guelph, Canada.
M J CostelloHomewood Research Institute, Guelph, Canada.
B RushHomewood Research Institute, Guelph, Canada; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
A V SamokhvalovHomewood Research Institute, Guelph, Canada; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
R E McCabePeter Boris Centre for Addiction Research, McMaster University & St. Joseph's Health Care, Hamilton, Canada.
J KellyRecovery Research Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
J MacKillopPeter Boris Centre for Addiction Research, McMaster University & St. Joseph's Health Care, Hamilton, Canada; Homewood Research Institute, Guelph, Canada. Electronic address: jmackill@mcmaster.ca.
Homewood Research Institute · CACentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAMassachusetts General Hospital · USSt Joseph's Health Care · CA

Funding

Investigating impulsivity and social network changes as novel mechanisms of behavior change for Alcoholics Anonymous' (AA) positive effectsR01AA025849 · NIAAA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KELLY, JOHN F., MACKILLOP, JAMES · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA025849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSubstance use disorders (SUD) are frequently comorbid with other psychiatric conditions, but a comprehensive diagnostic assessment is often not feasible clinically. Efficient psychometrically-validated screening tools exist for commonly comorbid conditions, but cutoff accuracies have typically not been evaluated in addiction treatment settings. This study examined the performance of several widely-used screening measures in relation to diagnostic status from a clinical interview to identify and validate cutoff scores in an inpatient SUD treatment setting.

methodParticipants were 99 patients in a large residential SUD treatment program in Ontario, Canada. Participants completed a screening battery, including the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7), and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-5 (PCL-5), and underwent a semi-structured diagnostic clinical interview. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine optimal cutoff scores on the screening tool against the interview-based diagnosis.

resultsArea under the curve (AUC) was statistically significant for all screens and were as follows: PHQ-9 = 0.70 (95% CI = 0.59-0.80), GAD-7 = 0.74 (95% CI = 0.63-0.84), and PCL-5 = 0.79 (95% CI = 0.66-0.91). The optimal accuracy cutoff scores based on sensitivity and specificity were: PHQ-9 ≥ 16, GAD-7 ≥ 9, the PCL-5 ≥ 42.

conclusionsIn general, the candidate screeners performed acceptably in this population. However, the optimal cutoff scores were notably higher than existing guidelines for depression and PTSD, potentially due to the general elevations in negative affectivity among individuals initiating SUD treatment. Further validation of these cutoff values is warranted. PUBLIC HEALTH SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides modified screening cutoff scores for major depression, anxiety disorders, and post-traumatic stress disorder in addiction treatment settings.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersDepressionStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticHumansInpatientsMass ScreeningOntarioPsychometricsSensitivity and SpecificityAnxiety DisorderDiagnosisMajor Depressive DisorderMeasurement-based CarePost-traumatic Stress DisorderScreeningSubstance Use Disorder

Identifiers

PMID32979691
PMCPMC11381827
OpenAlexW3084264499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.