Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32979313›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cell2020

Abscission Couples Cell Division to Embryonic Stem Cell Fate.

Agathe Chaigne, Céline Labouesse, Ian J White, Meghan Agnew, Edouard Hannezo, Kevin J Chalut, Ewa K Paluch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cell, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Coupling of stemness maintenance with cell cycle control in stem cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Agathe ChaigneMRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. Electronic address: a.chaigne@ucl.ac.uk.
Céline LabouesseWellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AW, UK.
Ian J WhiteMRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Meghan AgnewMRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Edouard HannezoInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg 3400, Austria.
Kevin J ChalutWellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AW, UK.
Ewa K PaluchMRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AW, UK; Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK. Electronic address: ekp25@cam.ac.uk.
MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBInstitute of Science and Technology Austria · ATWellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_12009Medical Research Council MC_PC_17230Medical Research Council MC_UU_00012/5Medical Research Council MC_UU_12018/5Wellcome Trust 201334/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell fate transitions are key to development and homeostasis. It is thus essential to understand the cellular mechanisms controlling fate transitions. Cell division has been implicated in fate decisions in many stem cell types, including neuronal and epithelial progenitors. In other stem cells, such as embryonic stem (ES) cells, the role of division remains unclear. Here, we show that exit from naive pluripotency in mouse ES cells generally occurs after a division. We further show that exit timing is strongly correlated between sister cells, which remain connected by cytoplasmic bridges long after division, and that bridge abscission progressively accelerates as cells exit naive pluripotency. Finally, interfering with abscission impairs naive pluripotency exit, and artificially inducing abscission accelerates it. Altogether, our data indicate that a switch in the division machinery leading to faster abscission regulates pluripotency exit. Our study identifies abscission as a key cellular process coupling cell division to fate transitions.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCell DifferentiationCytokinesisEmbryonic Stem CellsEndosomal Sorting Complexes Required for TransportHumansMiceMitosisMouse Embryonic Stem CellsEndosomal Sorting Complexes Required for Transportabscissionmidbodymitosisnaive pluripotencystem cells

Identifiers

PMID32979313
PMCPMC7594744
OpenAlexW3087991492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.