ReviewMolecular biology reports2020
Blood-derived molecular signatures as biomarker panels for the early detection of colorectal cancer.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autoantibody repertoire profiling in tissue and blood identifies colorectal cancer-specific biomarkers.Cancer science · 2024Article
- Multi-Omics Approaches in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, Recent Updates and Future Perspectives.Cancers · 2022Review
- Evaluation of the diagnostic value of serum-based proteomics for colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Article
- Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of tumor morbidity and mortality worldwide. Endoscopy is currently the main screening method, but the invasiveness and high cost hamper the application of endoscopy in asymptomatic patients with a risk of CRC and lead to a low diagnostic rate for early CRC. In recent years, the progress of transcriptomics, epigenetics, immunomics and metabolomics has greatly contributed to the identification of novel molecular markers for the noninvasive screening of CRC, and many molecules in various biological processes have been identified and evaluated for CRC detection. However, individual molecules always have insufficient diagnostic performance as biomarkers for the detection of CRC; therefore, a frequent strategy to overcome this deficiency is the use of molecule signatures as biomarker panels to improve the diagnostic power. Here, we reviewed the diagnostic performance of blood-derived molecular signatures (mRNAs, microRNAs, autoantibodies, and metabolites) as biomarker panels for CRC detection, particularly for early detection, and discussed their limitations and prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32979165What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.