ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021
Performance of cochlear implant recipients fitted with triphasic pulse patterns.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cochlear implantation among patients with otosclerosis: a systematic review of clinical characteristics and outcomes.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Cochlear implantation in common cavity deformity: a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Cochlear Implantation: Electrode Impedance in Users With Triphasic Pulse Pattern.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Cochlear-Facial Nerve Dehiscence and Facial Nerve Stimulation for Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
- Risk factors and management strategies of inadvertent facial nerve stimulation in cochlear implant recipients: A systematic review.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2023Review
- Tissue-Engineered Cochlear Fibrosis Model Links Complex Impedance to Fibrosis Formation for Cochlear Implant Patients.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Article
- Comparison of response properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve reported in human listeners and in animal models.Hearing research · 2022Review
- Evaluation of computed tomography parameters in patients with facial nerve stimulation post-cochlear implantation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the effect of triphasic pulse pattern stimulation strategy on the audiological performance of cochlear implant recipients with unintended facial nerve stimulation (FNS), and to compare the audiological and speech outcomes before and after switching to triphasic stimulation.
methodsA retrospective study of patients who have changed their fitting maps from biphasic to triphasic pulse pattern stimulation because of FNS after cochlear implantation (CI). All identified patients with FNS after CI from 2017 to 2019 were included in this study. The medical records of 11 patients (16 ears) were queried for demographic and radiological data, pure tone audiometry, speech reception thresholds, speech discrimination score at 65 dB, maximum comfortable levels, thresholds, and dynamic range. Then, these parameters were compared in the two conditions, biphasic and triphasic.
resultsUsing triphasic pulse stimulation only or combined with switch-off of few channels, complete resolution of FNS was achieved. Triphasic pulse pattern stimulation was associated with better speech discrimination scores (75.25 ± 26.13%) compared to the biphasic pulse (58.25 ± 26.13%). This triphasic strategy also showed higher maximum comfortable levels (36.62 ± 1.63 qu) than biphasic strategy (31.58 ± 2.5 qu). Moreover, the dynamic range was wider using triphasic pulse strategy. In general, the triphasic pulse pattern resulted in successful suppression of facial nerve stimulation with suitable maximum comfortable levels and better speech discrimination.
conclusionTriphasic pulse pattern stimulation is an appropriate tool in controlling FNS following cochlear implantation with wider dynamic range. We recommend that all patients with facial nerve stimulation after CI surgery be switched to a triphasic pulse program prior to considering further surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32979117What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.