Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32979069›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2021

Evaluating the efficacy of treatment options for anal intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review.

Danielle R L Brogden, Una Walsh, Gianluca Pellino, Christos Kontovounisios, Paris Tekkis, Sarah C Mills

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions for anal canal intraepithelial neoplasia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. German-Austrian guideline on screening for anal dysplasia and anal carcinoma in people living with HIV.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. [Update on anal dysplasia and anal cancer].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Short-term efficacy and safety of COFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  14. Radiation therapy in anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions-a pattern of care analysis in German-speaking countries.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Danielle R L BrogdenChelsea and Westminster Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, UK.
Una WalshChelsea and Westminster Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, UK.
Gianluca PellinoColorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Christos KontovounisiosChelsea and Westminster Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, UK. c.konotovounisios@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1828-1395
Paris TekkisChelsea and Westminster Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, UK.
Sarah C MillsChelsea and Westminster Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, UK.
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) is the accepted precursor of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). There has long been a hypothesis that treating AIN may prevent ASCC. Many different treatment modalities have been suggested and studied. We conducted this systematic review to evaluate their efficacy and the evidence as to whether we can prevent ASCC by treating AIN.

methodsMEDLINE and EMBASE were electronically searched using relevant search terms. All studies investigating the use of a single treatment for AIN that reported at least one end outcome such as partial or complete response to treatment, recurrence after treatment and/or ASCC diagnosis after treatment were included.

resultsThirty studies were included in the systematic review investigating 10 treatment modalities: 5% imiquimod, 5-fluorouracil, cidofovir, trichloroacetic acid, electrocautery, surgical excision, infrared coagulation, radiofrequency ablation, photodynamic therapy and HPV vaccination. All treatment modalities demonstrated some initial regression of AIN after treatment; however, recurrence rates were high especially in HIV-positive patients. Many of the studies suffered from significant bias which prevented direct comparison.

conclusionsAlthough the theory persists that by inducing the regression of AIN, we may be able to reduce the risk of ASCC, there was no clinical evidence within the literature advocating that treating AIN does prevent ASCC.

Indexed as

Anus NeoplasmsCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, Squamous CellHIV InfectionsPapillomavirus InfectionsHumansImiquimodNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalImiquimodAINAnal intraepithelial neoplasiaAnal squamous cell carcinomaCancerHIV

Identifiers

PMID32979069
PMCPMC7801290
OpenAlexW3088365214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.