Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32979014›Full record

ArticleIntegrated environmental assessment and management2021

Glyphosate Toxicity to Native Nontarget Macrophytes Following Three Different Routes of Incidental Exposure.

Verena Sesin, Christina M Davy, Kevin J Stevens, Rebekah Hamp, Joanna R Freeland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Verena SesinEnvironment and Life Sciences, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4003-2587
Christina M DavyWildlife Research and Monitoring Section, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.
Kevin J StevensDepartment of Biology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Rebekah HampDepartment of Biology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Joanna R FreelandDepartment of Biology, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2017-04371Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2018-04894Government of Ontario 19_18_Trent2Government of Ontario 89-19-WLU1Government of Ontario 89-19-WLU3Government of Ontario, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Species at Risk Research FundNSERC Discovery GrantsOntario Trillium ScholarshipOntario Trillium Scholarship for PhD StudiesTrent University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major goal of invasive plant management is the restoration of native biodiversity, but effective methods for invasive plant control can be harmful to native plants. Informed application of control methods is required to reach restoration goals. The herbicide glyphosate, commonly applied in invasive plant management, can be toxic to native macrophytes. Our study assessed the response of 2 macrophytes that are endangered in our study area (Ammannia robusta and Sida hermaphrodita) to glyphosate concentrations that mimic incidental exposure from nearby invasive plant control: spray drift of 4 × 10

Indexed as

GlycineHerbicidesEcotoxicologyGlyphosatePlantsGlycineGlyphosateHerbicidesEcological risk assessmentMycorrhizaeScarlet AmmanniaVirginia MallowWetland

Identifiers

PMID32979014
PMCPMC8246556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.