Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32978970›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2020

Predicting 3D body shape and body composition from conventional 2D photography.

Isaac Y Tian, Bennett K Ng, Michael C Wong, Samantha Kennedy, Phoenix Hwaung, Nisa Kelly, En Liu, Andrea K Garber, Brian Curless, Steven B Heymsfield and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. What Is aNutrients · 2022
    Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Isaac Y TianPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Bennett K NgIntel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, 95052, USA.
Michael C WongUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii - Manoa, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
Samantha KennedyPennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70808, USA.
Phoenix HwaungPennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70808, USA.
Nisa KellyUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii - Manoa, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
En LiuUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii - Manoa, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
Andrea K GarberUCSF School of Medicine, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94118, USA.
Brian CurlessPaul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Steven B HeymsfieldPennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70808, USA.
John A ShepherdUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii - Manoa, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.

Funding

Research BaseP30DK072476 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI ROBERT A KESTERSON · 2005 to 2026
$26.5M
ZIDOVUDINE &LAMIVUDINE &NEVIRAPINE COMBINATION THERAPY IN HIV 1 INFM01RR001271 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KESSLER, DAVID A · 1985 to 2006
$22.7M
UCSF Nutrition Obesity Research CenterP30DK098722 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Allison W Xu · 2015 to 2026
$14.6M
Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial of Refeeding in Anorexia NervosaR01HD082166 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GARBER, ANDREA K · 2015 to 2025
$5.7M
Shape up! KidsR01DK111698 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI HEYMSFIELD, STEVEN, SHEPHERD, JOHN ALAN · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
Optical Body Composition and Health AssessmentR01DK109008 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI HEYMSFIELD, STEVEN, SHEPHERD, JOHN ALAN · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
FutureweiHHS | NIH | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) R01DK109008HHS | NIH | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) R01DK111698NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR001271NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD082166NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072476NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK098722NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK109008NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK109008NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK111698NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK111698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTotal and regional body composition are important indicators of health and mortality risk, but their measurement is usually restricted to controlled environments in clinical settings with expensive and specialized equipment. A method that approaches the accuracy of the current gold standard method, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), while only requiring input from widely available consumer grade equipment, would enable the measurement of these important biometrics in the wild, enabling data collection at a scale that would have previously been prohibitive in time and expense. We describe an algorithm for predicting three-dimensional (3D) body shape and composition from a single frontal 2-dimensional image acquired with a digital consumer camera.

methodsDuplicate 3D optical scans, two-dimensional (2D) optical images, and DXA whole-body scans were available for 183 men and 233 women from the Shape Up! Adults Study. A principal component analysis vector basis was fit to 3D point clouds of a training subset of 152 men and 194 women. The relationship between this vector space and DXA-derived body composition was modeled with linear regression. The principal component 3D shape was then fitted to match a silhouette extracted from a 2D photograph of a novel body. Body composition was predicted from the resulting 3D shape match using the linear mapping between the principal component parameters and the DXA metrics. Accuracy of body composition estimates from the silhouette method was evaluated against a simple model using height and weight as a baseline, and against DXA measurements as ground truth. Test-retest precision of the silhouette method was evaluated using the duplicate 2D optical images and compared against precision of the duplicate DXA scans. Paired t-tests were performed to detect significant differences between the sets.

resultsResults were reported on a held-out set. Body composition prediction achieved R

conclusionTotal and regional body composition measures can be estimated from a single frontal photograph of a human body. Body composition prediction using consumer level photography can enable early screening and monitoring of possible physiological indicators of metabolic disease in regions where medical imagery or clinical assessment is inaccessible.

Indexed as

Body CompositionSomatotypesAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdipose TissueAdultBody WeightFemaleHumansMalePhotographybody compositiondual-energy x-ray absorptiometrynutritional assessmentobesityprincipal components analysissilhouette

Identifiers

PMID32978970
PMCPMC7796893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.