Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32978741›Full record

SynthesisJournal of immigrant and minority health2021

A Systematic Review of Medical-Legal Partnerships Serving Immigrant Communities in the United States.

Avery League, Katharine M Donato, Nima Sheth, Elizabeth Selden, Sheetal Patel, Laurie Ball Cooper, Emily Mendenhall

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Home, School, and Community-based Services for Forcibly Displaced Youth and Their Families.Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Health Justice Partnerships: An International Comparison of Approaches to Employing Law to Promote Prevention and Health Equity.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2023
    Article
  11. Structural Competency in Health Care.The Nursing clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  12. Legal Relief for Children in Immigrant Families: A Mixed-Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Avery LeagueScience, Technology, and International Affairs Program, Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, 513 Intercultural Center, 37th and O Street, NW, Washington, D.C, 20057, USA.
Katharine M DonatoInstitute for the Study of International Migration, Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C, USA.
Nima ShethDepartment of Psychiatry, Georgetown University Medical Center, and MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C, USA.
Elizabeth SeldenDepartment of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, and MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C, USA.
Sheetal PatelIndependent Psychology Practice, Washington, D.C, USA.
Laurie Ball CooperAyuda, Washington, D.C, USA.
Emily MendenhallScience, Technology, and International Affairs Program, Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, 513 Intercultural Center, 37th and O Street, NW, Washington, D.C, 20057, USA. Em1061@georgetown.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5826-1321

Funding

Soweto Syndemics: A Two-Phase Study of Surveillance and Co-Morbid ExperiencesR21TW010789 · FIC · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MENDENHALL, EMILY A · 2018 to 2020
$391k
FIC NIH HHS R21 TW010789Georgetown University Global Health Initiative
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The medical-legal partnership addresses social and political determinants of health. Yet, relatively little is known about best practices for these two service providers collaborating to deliver integrated services, particularly to im/migrant communities. To investigate evaluations of existing medical-legal partnerships in order to understand how they function together, what they provide, and how they define and deliver equitable, integrated care. We searched five databases (PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, HeinOnline, and Nexus Uni) using search terms related to "medical-legal partnerships", "migrants", and "United States". We systematically evaluated ten themes related to how medical and legal teams interacted, were situated, organized, and who they served. Articles were published in English between 2010 and 2019; required discussion about a direct partnership between medical and legal professionals; and focused on providing clinical care and legal services to im/migrant populations. Eighteen articles met our inclusion criteria. The most common form of partnership was a model in which legal clinics make regular referrals to medical clinics, although the reverse was also common. Most services were not co-located. Partnerships often engaged in advocacy work, provided translation services, and referred clients to non-medical providers and legal services. This review demonstrates the benefits of a legal-medical partnership, such as enhancing documentation and care for im/migrants and facilitating a greater attention to political determinants of health. Yet, this review demonstrates that, despite the increasing salience of such partnership, few have written up their lessons learned and best practices.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsTransients and MigrantsDelivery of Health CareHumansLegal ServicesUnited StatesAsylumHealth equityImmigrantMedical-legal partnershipRefugee

Identifiers

PMID32978741
PMCPMC7518399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.