Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32978734›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Lake water-level fluctuation forecasting using machine learning models: a systematic review.

Senlin Zhu, Hongfang Lu, Mariusz Ptak, Jiangyu Dai, Qingfeng Ji

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Senlin ZhuCollege of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225127, China. slzhu@nhri.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7561-8372
Hongfang LuDivision of Construction Engineering and Management, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Mariusz PtakDepartment of Hydrology and Water Management, Adam Mickiewicz University, Krygowskiego 10, 61-680, Poznan, Poland.
Jiangyu DaiState Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, 210029, China. jydai@nhri.cn.
Qingfeng JiCollege of Hydraulic Science and Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225127, China. qfji@yzu.edu.cn.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2018M640499National Key R&D Program of China 2018YFC0407203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lake water-level fluctuation is a complex and dynamic process, characterized by high stochasticity and nonlinearity, and difficult to model and forecast. In recent years, applications of machine learning (ML) models have yielded substantial progress in forecasting lake water-level fluctuations. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the applications of ML models for modeling water-level dynamics in lakes. Among the many existing ML models, seven popular ML model types are reviewed: (1) artificial neural network (ANN); (2) support vector machine (SVM); (3) artificial neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS); (4) hybrid models, such as hybrid wavelet-artificial neural network (WA-ANN) model, hybrid wavelet-artificial neuro-fuzzy inference system (WA-ANFIS) model, and hybrid wavelet-support vector machine (WA-SVM) model; (5) evolutionary models, such as gene expression programming (GEP) and genetic programming (GP); (6) extreme learning machine (ELM); and (7) deep learning (DL). Model inputs, data split, model performance criteria, and model inter-comparison as well as the associated issues are discussed. The advantages and limitations of the established ML models are also discussed. Some specific directions for future research are also offered. This review provides a new vision for hydrologists and water resources planners for sustainable management of lakes.

Indexed as

LakesMachine LearningForecastingNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector MachineLakesMachine learningNonlinearityStochasticityWater-level modeling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.