Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32978715›Full record

ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2020

One-step genome editing of porcine zygotes through the electroporation of a CRISPR/Cas9 system with two guide RNAs.

Maki Hirata, Manita Wittayarat, Fuminori Tanihara, Yoko Sato, Zhao Namula, Quynh Anh Le, Qingyi Lin, Koki Takebayashi, Takeshige Otoi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. One-Step In Vitro Generation of ETV2-Null Pig Embryos.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  3. Target-AID-Mediated Multiplex Base Editing in Porcine Fibroblasts.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  4. Current status of the application of gene editing in pigs.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Maki HirataLaboratory of Animal Reproduction, Faculty of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, 2272-1 Ishii, Myozai-gun, Tokushima, 779-3233, Japan.
Manita WittayaratFaculty of Veterinary Science, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Fuminori TaniharaLaboratory of Animal Reproduction, Faculty of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, 2272-1 Ishii, Myozai-gun, Tokushima, 779-3233, Japan. tanihara@tokushima-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2158-5808
Yoko SatoSchool of Biological Science, Tokai University, Sapporo, Japan.
Zhao NamulaCollege of Agricultural Science, Guangdong Ocean University, Guangdong, China.
Quynh Anh LeLaboratory of Animal Reproduction, Faculty of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, 2272-1 Ishii, Myozai-gun, Tokushima, 779-3233, Japan.
Qingyi LinLaboratory of Animal Reproduction, Faculty of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, 2272-1 Ishii, Myozai-gun, Tokushima, 779-3233, Japan.
Koki TakebayashiLaboratory of Animal Reproduction, Faculty of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, 2272-1 Ishii, Myozai-gun, Tokushima, 779-3233, Japan.
Takeshige OtoiLaboratory of Animal Reproduction, Faculty of Bioscience and Bioindustry, Tokushima University, 2272-1 Ishii, Myozai-gun, Tokushima, 779-3233, Japan.
Tokushima University · JPGuangdong Ocean University · CNPrince of Songkla University · THTokai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated whether electroporation could be used for one-step multiplex CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing, targeting IL2RG and GHR in porcine embryos. First, we evaluated and selected guide RNAs (gRNAs) by analyzing blastocyst formation rates and genome editing efficiency. This was performed in embryos electroporated with one of three different gRNAs targeting IL2RG or one of two gRNAs targeting GHR. No significant differences in embryo development rates were found between control embryos and those subjected to electroporation, irrespective of the target gene. Two gRNAs targeting IL2RG (nos. 2 and 3) contributed to an increased biallelic mutation rate in porcine blastocysts compared with gRNA no. 1. There were no significant differences in the mutation rates between the two gRNAs targeting GHR. In our next experiment, the mutation efficiency and the development of embryos simultaneously electroporated with gRNAs targeting IL2RG and GHR were investigated. Similar embryo development rates were observed between embryos electroporated with two gRNAs and control embryos. When IL2RG-targeting gRNA no. 2 was used with GHR-targeting gRNAs no. 1 or no. 2, a significantly higher double biallelic mutation rate was observed than with IL2RG-targeting gRNA no. 3. In conclusion, we demonstrate the feasibility of using electroporation to transfer multiple gRNAs and Cas9 into porcine zygotes, enabling the double biallelic mutation of multiple genes with favorable embryo survival.

Indexed as

ElectroporationGene EditingAnimalsBase SequenceBlastocystCRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Cas SystemsInterleukin Receptor Common gamma SubunitMutationReceptors, SomatotropinRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsSwineZygoteCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Interleukin Receptor Common gamma SubunitReceptors, SomatotropinRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCRISPR/Cas9ElectroporationGHRIL2RGPig

Identifiers

PMID32978715
OpenAlexW3088203646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.