Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32978681›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2020

Water quality evaluation of two urban streams in Northwest Uruguay: are national regulations for urban stream quality sufficient?

Elena Alvareda, Christine Lucas, Mercedes Paradiso, Adriana Piperno, Pablo Gamazo, Vanessa Erasun, Paola Russo, Andres Saracho, Rafael Banega, Gonzalo Sapriza and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena AlvaredaDepartamento del Agua, Universidad de la República, University Center of Salto, 1350, Salto, Rivera, Uruguay. alvareda@fq.edu.uy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-5741
Christine LucasDepartamento del Agua, Universidad de la República, University Center of Salto, 1350, Salto, Rivera, Uruguay.
Mercedes ParadisoUnidad de Gestión Ambiental, Paysandu Municipal Government, Sarandí esq. Zorrilla de San Martín., 60000, Paysandú, Uruguay.
Adriana PipernoFacultad de Arquitectura Diseño y Urbanismo, Universidad de la República, Br. Artigas, 1031, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Pablo GamazoDepartamento del Agua, Universidad de la República, University Center of Salto, 1350, Salto, Rivera, Uruguay.
Vanessa ErasunDepartamento del Agua, Universidad de la República, University Center of Salto, 1350, Salto, Rivera, Uruguay.
Paola RussoDepartamento del Agua, Universidad de la República, University Center of Salto, 1350, Salto, Rivera, Uruguay.
Andres SarachoDepartamento del Agua, Universidad de la República, University Center of Salto, 1350, Salto, Rivera, Uruguay.
Rafael BanegaDepartamento del Agua, Universidad de la República, University Center of Salto, 1350, Salto, Rivera, Uruguay.
Gonzalo SaprizaDepartamento del Agua, Universidad de la República, University Center of Salto, 1350, Salto, Rivera, Uruguay.
Franco Teixeira de MelloDepartmento de Ecología y Gestión Ambiental, Universidad de la República, CURE Tacuarembó, 20100, Maldonado, Uruguay.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4904-6985
Universidad de la República de Uruguay · UY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poor water quality in urban streams places at risk the health of urban residents and the integrity of urban environments, ultimately leading to the "urban stream syndrome." In response to growing concerns regarding urban streams in Uruguay, we evaluated the spatiotemporal variation in water quality parameters in two urban streams, the Ceibal and La Curtiembre streams, over 12-18 months. A proposal for an Urban Water Quality Index (UWQI) was developed based on national water quality standards for two stream classes to assess variability in overall stream condition over time. Both streams displayed extremely high levels of fecal coliform concentrations in mid-downstream sites and relatively high levels of total dissolved phosphorus and ammonia well above the national standards of 0.025 mg/L and 0.02 mg/L, respectively. Nitrate was consistently below the national maximum of 44.3 mg/L, calling to question the adequacy of this standard for designated uses. Over 40% of samples had oxygen levels below the national standard of 5 mg/L, and a dead zone (average 1.5 mg/L) was detected in the downstream reach of the La Curtiembre stream. Despite differences in land use and urban context, monthly observations of nutrients and coliforms indicated high levels of contamination in mid-downstream reaches, which could present a health risk for the populations in Paysandú and Salto. This study highlights the degradation of urban streams in two major cities in Uruguay and the need for a comparative diagnosis of stream condition as a basis for decision-making regarding urban development and water resources.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringWater QualityCitiesPhosphorusUruguayPhosphorusBasin characterizationUrban streamWater pollutionWater quality index

Identifiers

PMID32978681
OpenAlexW3088260738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.