ArticleSkeletal radiology2021
An assessment of fluid-fluid levels on magnetic resonance imaging of spinal tumours.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the degree of fluid-fluid levels on MRI in spinal tumours compared with final diagnosis, and the outcome of needle biopsy in such cases. MATERIALS AND
methodsRetrospective review of patients with a spinal tumour that contained fluid-fluid levels. Data collected included age, sex, spinal location, and final diagnosis. The outcome of needle biopsy was investigated.
resultsForty-two patients were included (19 males; 24 females; mean age 27.5 years, range 5-80 years), the commonest diagnoses being aneurysmal bone cyst (n = 25; 59.5%) and metastasis (n = 5; 11.9%). All patients with a malignant diagnosis were > 50 years of age apart from 2 who had metastases from a known primary cancer, while all patients apart from 1 with aneurysmal bone cyst were < 35 years of age. Needle biopsy was undertaken in 29 cases (69%) and diagnostic in 18 (62%). Patients with FFL occupying > 2/3 of the lesion were significantly more likely to have an aneurysmal bone cyst (p = 0.008) while those with FFL occupying < 2/3 of the lesion were more likely to have a malignant tumour (p = 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of > 2/3 FFLs occupying the lesion were 97.1%, 75%, 94.3%, 85.7%, and 92.9% respectively for differentiating a benign from a malignant spinal tumour.
conclusionsChildren and younger adults with spinal lesions containing > 2/3 FFLs were very unlikely to have malignancy. However, in patients > 50 years of age or those with lesions containing < 2/3 FFLs, a malignant lesion is much more likely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32978680What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.