ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2020
Is partial pulpotomy in cariously exposed posterior permanent teeth a viable treatment option?
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modified pulpotomy procedure in immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2022Trial
- Pulpotomy versus root canal treatment in permanent teeth with spontaneous pain: comparable clinical and patient outcomes, but insufficient evidence.Evidence-based dentistry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data sources PubMed, ScienceDirect and Cochrane, Open Grey. Journal of Dentistry; Journal of Endodontics; International Endodontic Journal; Australian Endodontic Journal; and Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and EndodonticsStudy selection Two independent reviewers screened the titles, abstracts and/or full-text for randomised clinical trials and prospective clinical studies dealing with the success rate of treating cariously exposed vital human permanent posterior teeth with a partial pulpotomy. The cases were followed up for 6 to 24 months.Results The study included five randomised clinical trials and six prospective studies. The pooled data indicated that partial pulpotomy in carious exposed teeth had a success rate of 98%, 96% and 92% after 6 months and 1 and 2 years of follow-up. However, teeth with a presumptive diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis displayed significantly lower success rates. Interestingly, neither the pulp capping material used nor the status of the root apex (apical root closure) or age of the patient affected the treatment success rate.Conclusion The study reported high 2 year success rates when cariously exposed permanent posterior teeth were treated using a partial pulpotomy procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.