ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2020
Children with type 1 diabetes and caries - are they linked?
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Poor glycemic control impairs oral health in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus - a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2024Pooled it
- Downregulation of Salivary Proteins, Protective against Dental Caries, in Type 1 Diabetes.Proteomes · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Data sources PubMed, EMBASE and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Manual review of reference list of included studies.Study selection Cross-sectional studies or the first evaluation of longitudinal studies that were conducted on patients (<18 years old) with a known diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). The primary outcome was prevalence of dental caries.Data extraction and synthesis Selection of studies, data extraction and risk of bias assessment was performed, independently, by two members of the review team. Inter-rater reliability (kappa = 0.68) was provided. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale, modified specifically to this review, was used to assess study quality and bias. Where appropriate, data was pooled and analysed using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were carried out where possible.Results Four hundred and eighty-eight potential articles were screened; 83 full-text articles were reviewed, with ten (involving a total of 538 patients) included in the meta-analysis. Seven studies were adjudged to be of high quality and three of low quality using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Overall, pooled prevalence of dental caries, among children and adolescents with type 1 DM, was 67% (95%CI: 0.56-0.77%; I2 = 83%; p<0.01). Subgroup analyses (geographic location and diabetic control) highlighted pooled prevalence was highest at 84% (95%CI: 0.67-0.94%; I2 = 49%; p = 0.16) in South America and 66% (95%CI: 0.43-0.83%; I2 = 87%; p<0.01) in those with bad diabetic control.Conclusions Caries prevalence is high among children and adolescents with type 1 DM. Diabetic children and adolescents need to be regularly screened for dental disease. Consistent preventive measures are required, from all healthcare professionals involved in the care of these patients, to ensure a balance in struck between optimum oral health and diabetic control for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.