Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32978485›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A new isolation device for shortening gene flow distance in small-scale transgenic maize breeding.

Lili Zhang, Shanshan Huo, Yang Cao, Xiang Xie, Yanhua Tan, Yuliang Zhang, Hui Zhao, Pingping He, Jingyuan Guo, Qiyu Xia and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lili ZhangInstitute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Resources of Tropical Crops, Hainan Key Laboratory for Biosafety Monitoring and Molecular Breeding in Off-Season Reproduction Regions, CATAS, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, China.
Shanshan HuoInstitute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Resources of Tropical Crops, Hainan Key Laboratory for Biosafety Monitoring and Molecular Breeding in Off-Season Reproduction Regions, CATAS, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, China.
Yang CaoInstitute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Resources of Tropical Crops, Hainan Key Laboratory for Biosafety Monitoring and Molecular Breeding in Off-Season Reproduction Regions, CATAS, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, China.
Xiang XieInstitute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Resources of Tropical Crops, Hainan Key Laboratory for Biosafety Monitoring and Molecular Breeding in Off-Season Reproduction Regions, CATAS, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, China.
Yanhua TanInstitute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Resources of Tropical Crops, Hainan Key Laboratory for Biosafety Monitoring and Molecular Breeding in Off-Season Reproduction Regions, CATAS, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, China.
Yuliang ZhangInstitute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Resources of Tropical Crops, Hainan Key Laboratory for Biosafety Monitoring and Molecular Breeding in Off-Season Reproduction Regions, CATAS, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, China.
Hui ZhaoInstitute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Resources of Tropical Crops, Hainan Key Laboratory for Biosafety Monitoring and Molecular Breeding in Off-Season Reproduction Regions, CATAS, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, China.
Pingping HeInstitute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Resources of Tropical Crops, Hainan Key Laboratory for Biosafety Monitoring and Molecular Breeding in Off-Season Reproduction Regions, CATAS, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, China.
Jingyuan GuoInstitute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Resources of Tropical Crops, Hainan Key Laboratory for Biosafety Monitoring and Molecular Breeding in Off-Season Reproduction Regions, CATAS, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, China.
Qiyu XiaInstitute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Resources of Tropical Crops, Hainan Key Laboratory for Biosafety Monitoring and Molecular Breeding in Off-Season Reproduction Regions, CATAS, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, China.
Xia ZhouInstitute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Resources of Tropical Crops, Hainan Key Laboratory for Biosafety Monitoring and Molecular Breeding in Off-Season Reproduction Regions, CATAS, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, China.
Huan LongInstitute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Resources of Tropical Crops, Hainan Key Laboratory for Biosafety Monitoring and Molecular Breeding in Off-Season Reproduction Regions, CATAS, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, China.
Anping GuoInstitute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Resources of Tropical Crops, Hainan Key Laboratory for Biosafety Monitoring and Molecular Breeding in Off-Season Reproduction Regions, CATAS, Haikou, 571101, Hainan, China. guoanping@itbb.org.cn.
Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology Research Institute · CNChinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transmission of pollen is the main cause of maize gene flow. Under the compulsory labeling system for genetically modified (GM) products in China, isolation measures are crucial. At present, there is no effective isolation device for preventing and controlling the short-range flow of GM maize pollen. The purposes of the present experiments were to overcome the deficiencies of existing technology and to demonstrate a new isolation device for decreasing the gene flow distance of GM maize. The isolation device we invented was shown to be more robust than traditional isolation methods, and it can be disassembled and repeatedly reused. The most important point was that the frequency of gene flow could be greatly reduced using this device. When the distance from the isolation device was more than 1 m, the gene flow rate could be decreased to less than 1%, and when the distance from the isolation device was more than 10 m, the gene flow rate could be reduced to less than 0.1%. When the isolation device was adopted to isolate GM maize in conjunction with bagging the tassels of GM maize at the pollination stage, the gene flow could be controlled to less than 0.1% when the distance from the isolation device was more than 1 m. This device was, however, only applicable for small plots and can shorten the isolation distance of GM maize planting and improve the purity of seeds, all while meeting the needs of close isolation breeding. The use of this device represents a feasible method for risk prevention and control of GM crops.

Indexed as

AgricultureChinaCrops, AgriculturalGene FlowPlant BreedingPlants, Genetically ModifiedPollinationZea mays

Identifiers

PMID32978485
PMCPMC7519140
OpenAlexW3088359488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.