Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32978470›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces.

Riad Sahli, Aubin Prot, Anle Wang, Martin H Müser, Michal Piovarči, Piotr Didyk, Roland Bennewitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Riad SahliINM - Leibniz Institute for New Materials, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Aubin ProtINM - Leibniz Institute for New Materials, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Anle WangDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Saarland University, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Martin H MüserINM - Leibniz Institute for New Materials, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Michal PiovarčiCluster of Excellence (MMCI), Saarland Informatics Campus, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Piotr DidykCluster of Excellence (MMCI), Saarland Informatics Campus, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Roland BennewitzINM - Leibniz Institute for New Materials, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany. roland.bennewitz@leibniz-inm.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most everyday surfaces are randomly rough and self-similar on sufficiently small scales. We investigated the tactile perception of randomly rough surfaces using 3D-printed samples, where the topographic structure and the statistical properties of scale-dependent roughness were varied independently. We found that the tactile perception of similarity between surfaces was dominated by the statistical micro-scale roughness rather than by their topographic resemblance. Participants were able to notice differences in the Hurst roughness exponent of 0.2, or a difference in surface curvature of 0.8 [Formula: see text] for surfaces with curvatures between 1 and 3 [Formula: see text]. In contrast, visual perception of similarity between color-coded images of the surface height was dominated by their topographic resemblance. We conclude that vibration cues from roughness at the length scale of the finger ridge distance distract the participants from including the topography into the judgement of similarity. The interaction between surface asperities and fingertip skin led to higher friction for higher micro-scale roughness. Individual friction data allowed us to construct a psychometric curve which relates similarity decisions to differences in friction. Participants noticed differences in the friction coefficient as small as 0.035 for samples with friction coefficients between 0.34 and 0.45.

Indexed as

Discrimination, PsychologicalAdultFemaleFingersFrictionHumansMaleMiddle AgedSkinSurface PropertiesTouchTouch PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32978470
PMCPMC7519105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.