Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32978379›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

A machine learning Automated Recommendation Tool for synthetic biology.

Tijana Radivojević, Zak Costello, Kenneth Workman, Hector Garcia Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Artificial intelligence-driven advancements in agricultural biotechnology.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Yeast as a Model for Human Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tijana RadivojevićDOE Agile BioFoundry, Emeryville, CA, 94608, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7165-2909
Zak CostelloDOE Agile BioFoundry, Emeryville, CA, 94608, USA.
Kenneth WorkmanDOE Agile BioFoundry, Emeryville, CA, 94608, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3958-7465
Hector Garcia MartinDOE Agile BioFoundry, Emeryville, CA, 94608, USA. hgmartin@lbl.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4556-9685

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic biology allows us to bioengineer cells to synthesize novel valuable molecules such as renewable biofuels or anticancer drugs. However, traditional synthetic biology approaches involve ad-hoc engineering practices, which lead to long development times. Here, we present the Automated Recommendation Tool (ART), a tool that leverages machine learning and probabilistic modeling techniques to guide synthetic biology in a systematic fashion, without the need for a full mechanistic understanding of the biological system. Using sampling-based optimization, ART provides a set of recommended strains to be built in the next engineering cycle, alongside probabilistic predictions of their production levels. We demonstrate the capabilities of ART on simulated data sets, as well as experimental data from real metabolic engineering projects producing renewable biofuels, hoppy flavored beer without hops, fatty acids, and tryptophan. Finally, we discuss the limitations of this approach, and the practical consequences of the underlying assumptions failing.

Indexed as

Machine LearningBayes TheoremBeerBiofuelsDodecanolEscherichia coliFatty AcidsMetabolic EngineeringSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSynthetic BiologyBiofuelsDodecanolFatty Acids

Identifiers

PMID32978379
PMCPMC7519645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.