Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32978322›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2021

Seven features of safety in maternity units: a framework based on multisite ethnography and stakeholder consultation.

Elisa Giulia Liberati, Carolyn Tarrant, Janet Willars, Tim Draycott, Cathy Winter, Karolina Kuberska, Alexis Paton, Sonja Marjanovic, Brandi Leach, Catherine Lichten and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06926504 (TeamBirth - an Intervention to Improve Patient Safety and Person-centered Care During Childbirth), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06926504 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

TeamBirth - an Intervention to Improve Patient Safety and Person-centered Care During Childbirth

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2024 to 2029Enrolled800,000ConditionsPerson Centered Care, Patient Safety, Patient SatisfactionArmsThe care process S-TeamBirth, S-TeamBirth
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The social networks of hospital staff: A realist synthesis.Journal of health services research & policy · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa Giulia LiberatiTHIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4981-1210
Carolyn TarrantDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, Leicestershire, UK.
Janet WillarsDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, Leicestershire, UK.
Tim DraycottDepartment of Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Cathy WinterPROMPT Maternity Foundation, Bristol, UK.
Karolina KuberskaTHIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Alexis PatonDepartment of Sociology and Policy, Aston Medical School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Sonja MarjanovicTHIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Brandi LeachRAND Europe, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Catherine LichtenRAND Europe, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Lucy HockingRAND Europe, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Sarah BallRAND Europe, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Mary Dixon-WoodsTHIS Institute (The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute), Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK director@thisinstitute.cam.ac.uk.
SCALING Authorship Group
RAND Europe · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBAston University · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU2Wellcome Trust WT097899MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReducing avoidable harm in maternity services is a priority globally. As well as learning from mistakes, it is important to produce rigorous descriptions of 'what good looks like'.

objectiveWe aimed to characterise features of safety in maternity units and to generate a plain language framework that could be used to guide learning and improvement.

methodsWe conducted a multisite ethnography involving 401 hours of non-participant observations 33 semistructured interviews with staff across six maternity units, and a stakeholder consultation involving 65 semistructured telephone interviews and one focus group.

resultsWe identified seven features of safety in maternity units and summarised them into a framework, named

conclusionsThis large qualitative study has enabled the generation of a new plain language framework-For Us-that identifies the behaviours and practices that appear to be features of safe care in hospital-based maternity units.

Indexed as

Anthropology, CulturalReferral and ConsultationFemaleFocus GroupsHumansPregnancyQualitative Researchhealthcare quality improvementobstetrics and gynecologypatient safetyqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID32978322
PMCPMC8142434
OpenAlexW3088315799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.