Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32978313›Full record

ArticlemBio2020

Rescue of SARS-CoV-2 from a Single Bacterial Artificial Chromosome.

Chengjin Ye, Kevin Chiem, Jun-Gyu Park, Fatai Oladunni, Roy Nelson Platt, Tim Anderson, Fernando Almazan, Juan Carlos de la Torre, Luis Martinez-Sobrido

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Viral syncytia evolve to resist interferon.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A bireporter recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Chengjin YeTexas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Kevin ChiemTexas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Jun-Gyu ParkTexas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Fatai OladunniTexas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Roy Nelson PlattTexas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Tim AndersonTexas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Fernando AlmazanDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Juan Carlos de la TorreDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Luis Martinez-SobridoTexas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA lmartinez@txbiomed.org.ORCID 0000-0001-7084-0804
Texas Biomedical Research Institute · USCentro Nacional de Biotecnología · ESScripps Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious coronavirus (CoV) disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged in the city of Wuhan (China) in December 2019, causing a pandemic that has dramatically impacted public health and socioeconomic activities worldwide. A previously unknown coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been identified as the causative agent of COVID-19. To date, there are no U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved vaccines or therapeutics available for the prevention or treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or associated COVID-19 disease, which has triggered a large influx of scientific efforts to develop countermeasures to control SARS-CoV-2 spread. To contribute to these efforts, we have developed an infectious cDNA clone of the SARS-CoV-2 USA-WA1/2020 strain based on the use of a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC). Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 (rSARS-CoV-2) was readily rescued by transfection of the BAC into Vero E6 cells. Importantly, BAC-derived rSARS-CoV-2 exhibited growth properties and plaque sizes in cultured cells comparable to those of the natural SARS-CoV-2 isolate. Likewise, rSARS-CoV-2 showed levels of replication similar to those of the natural isolate in nasal turbinates and lungs of infected golden Syrian hamsters. This is, to our knowledge, the first BAC-based reverse genetics system for the generation of infectious rSARS-CoV-2 that displays features

Indexed as

AnimalsBetacoronavirusChlorocebus aethiopsChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19CricetinaeDNA, ComplementaryGenome, ViralPandemicsPneumonia, ViralReverse GeneticsRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Vero CellsVirus ReplicationDNA, ComplementaryRNA, ViralBACcoronavirusCOVID-19hamstersrecombinant virusreverse geneticsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32978313
PMCPMC7520601
OpenAlexW3088885706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.