Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32978188›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Efficacy of acupuncture versus sham acupuncture or waitlist control for patients with chronic plantar fasciitis: study protocol for a two-centre randomised controlled trial.

Weiming Wang, Sixing Liu, Yan Liu, Zhiwei Zang, Weina Zhang, Liang Li, Zhishun Liu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04185259 (Efficacy of Acupuncture vs Sham Acupuncture or Waitlist Control for Patients With Chronic Planter Fasciitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04185259 naunknown statusnot on this map

Efficacy of Acupuncture vs Sham Acupuncture or Waitlist Control for Patients With Chronic Planter Fasciitis: Study Protocol for a 2-center Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical SciencesRan2020 to 2022Enrolled120ConditionsPlantar FasciitisArmsAcupuncture, Sham acupuncture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Weiming Wang *Acupuncture and Moxibustion Department, China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Guang'anmen Hospital, Xicheng District, China.
Sixing Liu *School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang City, Guizhou, China.
Yan Liu *Key Laboratory of Chinese Internal Medicine of Ministry of Education, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Zhiwei ZangDepartment of Acupuncture, Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yantai, China.
Weina ZhangAcupuncture and Moxibustion Department, China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Guang'anmen Hospital, Xicheng District, China.
Liang LiDepartment of Ultrasound, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences Guanganmen Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Zhishun LiuAcupuncture and Moxibustion Department, China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Guang'anmen Hospital, Xicheng District, China zhishunjournal@163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7570-8917
Guang’anmen Hospital · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNGuizhou University · CNYantaishan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPlantar fasciitis (PF) is reported to be the most common cause of plantar heel pain. Acupuncture has been used for patients experiencing PF, but evidence of the efficacy of acupuncture on PF is limited. The primary objective of this trial is to compare combined acupuncture and sham acupuncture (SA) versus waitlist control for improving the level of pain experienced by patients suffering from chronic PF. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a two-centre, parallel-group, sham and no-treatment controlled, assessor-blinded randomised trial. We will randomly allocate 120 participants with chronic PF to acupuncture, SA and waitlist control groups at a ratio of 2:1:1. Participants in the acupuncture and SA groups will receive a 30 min acupuncture or SA treatment for a total of 12 sessions over 4 weeks, with a 12-week follow-up. Participants in the waitlist control group will not undergo treatment for a period of 16 weeks but instead will have the option of 4 weeks (12 sessions) of acupuncture free of charge at the end of the follow-up period. The primary outcome will be the treatment response rate 4 weeks after randomisation, assessed as a minimum of 50% improvement in the worst pain intensity during the first steps in the morning compared with the baseline. All analyses will be performed with a two-sided p value of <0.05 considered significant following the intention-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Ethical Committee of the Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (approval no. 2019-210-KY). The results will be disseminated through presentation at a peer-reviewed medical journal, the relevant conferences and scientific meetings.

trial registrationNCT04185259.

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyFasciitis, PlantarChinaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeWaiting Listsclinical trialscomplementary medicinepain management

Identifiers

PMID32978188
PMCPMC7520861
OpenAlexW3088161399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.