Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32978185›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Enhanced Recovery after Intensive Care (ERIC): study protocol for a German stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a critical care telehealth program on process quality and functional outcomes.

Christine Adrion, Bjoern Weiss, Nicolas Paul, Elke Berger, Reinhard Busse, Ursula Marschall, Jörg Caumanns, Simone Rosseau, Ulrich Mansmann, Claudia Spies and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03671447 (Enhanced Recovery After Intensive Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03671447 nacompletednot on this map

Enhanced Recovery After Intensive Care (ERIC) - a Multi-Center Stepped Wedge Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharite University, Berlin, GermanyRan2018 to 2020Enrolled1,463ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsICU Usual Care, Tele-ICU
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. [Standardized ward rounds in the intensive care unit].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Christine Adrion *Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2408-2533
Bjoern Weiss *Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3139-595X
Nicolas PaulDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2228-3980
Elke BergerDepartment of Health Care Management, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Reinhard BusseDepartment of Health Care Management, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4961-9130
Ursula MarschallBARMER, Wuppertal, Germany.
Jörg CaumannsFraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems, Berlin, Germany.
Simone RosseauWeaning and Ventilation Centre, Ernst von Bergmann Klinikum, Bad Belzig, Germany.
Ulrich MansmannInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9955-8906
Claudia SpiesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany claudia.spies@charite.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1062-0495
ERIC study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurvival after critical illness has noticeably improved over the last decades due to advances in critical care medicine. Besides, there is an increasing number of elderly patients with chronic diseases being treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). More than half of the survivors of critical illness suffer from medium-term or long-term cognitive, psychological and/or physical impairments after ICU discharge, which is recognised as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). There are evidence-based and consensus-based quality indicators (QIs) in intensive care medicine, which have a positive influence on patients' long-term outcomes if adhered to. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol of a multicentre, pragmatic, stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled, quality improvement trial is presented. During 3 predefined steps, 12 academic hospitals in Berlin and Brandenburg, Germany, are randomly selected to move in a one-way crossover from the control to the intervention condition. After a multifactorial training programme on QIs and clinical outcomes for site personnel, ICUs will receive an adapted, interprofessional protocol for a complex telehealth intervention comprising of daily telemedical rounds at ICU. The targeted sample size is 1431 patients. The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention on the adherence to eight QIs daily measured during the patient's ICU stay, compared with standard of care. Furthermore, the impact on long-term recovery such as PICS-related, patient-centred outcomes including health-related quality of life, mental health, clinical assessments of cognition and physical function, all-cause mortality and cost-effectiveness 3 and 6 months after ICU discharge will be evaluated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany (EA1/006/18). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and presented at international conferences. Study findings will also be disseminated via the website (www.eric-projekt.net). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03671447).

Indexed as

Quality of LifeTelemedicineAgedBerlinCritical CareCritical IllnessGermanyHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicadult intensive & critical careclinical trialshealth economicsmedical education & trainingquality in health caretelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32978185
PMCPMC7520839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.