ArticleBMJ open2020
Enhanced Recovery after Intensive Care (ERIC): study protocol for a German stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a critical care telehealth program on process quality and functional outcomes.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03671447 (Enhanced Recovery After Intensive Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Enhanced Recovery After Intensive Care (ERIC) - a Multi-Center Stepped Wedge Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of an intensive care telemedicine program on weaning from invasive ventilation: a secondary analysis of the ERIC trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Health-related quality of life correlates with patient-reported and proxy-reported disability in critical illness survivors: a secondary analysis of the ERIC trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Trial
- Effectiveness of an intensive care telehealth programme to improve process quality (ERIC): a multicentre stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.Intensive care medicine · 2023Trial
- [Standardized ward rounds in the intensive care unit].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026Review
- Comparison of Open Visiting and Restricted Visiting in ICU Chronic Critical Patients: Effects on Negative Emotions and Delirium.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Telemedicine in adult intensive care: A systematic review of patient-relevant outcomes and methodological considerations.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Teleneurology expertise in intensive care units across Germany - a nationwide survey.Neurological research and practice · 2025Article
- [Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: functional impairments of critical illness survivors].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2025Review
- Highlights from the Respiratory Failure and Mechanical Ventilation Conference 2024.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2024Article
- Quantification of muscle recovery in post-ICU patients admitted for acute pancreatitis: a longitudinal single-center study.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Article
- Opportunistic screening for long-term muscle wasting in critically ill patients: insights from an acute pancreatitis cohort.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Intermittent body composition analysis as monitoring tool for muscle wasting in critically ill COVID-19 patients.Annals of intensive care · 2023Article
- Impact of a Postintensive Care Unit Multidisciplinary Follow-up on the Quality of Life (SUIVI-REA): Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
- Chicken or the egg? Critical illness and mental health.Intensive care medicine · 2021Article
- [Enhanced Recovery after Intensive Care-ERIC].Der Anaesthesist · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSurvival after critical illness has noticeably improved over the last decades due to advances in critical care medicine. Besides, there is an increasing number of elderly patients with chronic diseases being treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). More than half of the survivors of critical illness suffer from medium-term or long-term cognitive, psychological and/or physical impairments after ICU discharge, which is recognised as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). There are evidence-based and consensus-based quality indicators (QIs) in intensive care medicine, which have a positive influence on patients' long-term outcomes if adhered to. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol of a multicentre, pragmatic, stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled, quality improvement trial is presented. During 3 predefined steps, 12 academic hospitals in Berlin and Brandenburg, Germany, are randomly selected to move in a one-way crossover from the control to the intervention condition. After a multifactorial training programme on QIs and clinical outcomes for site personnel, ICUs will receive an adapted, interprofessional protocol for a complex telehealth intervention comprising of daily telemedical rounds at ICU. The targeted sample size is 1431 patients. The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention on the adherence to eight QIs daily measured during the patient's ICU stay, compared with standard of care. Furthermore, the impact on long-term recovery such as PICS-related, patient-centred outcomes including health-related quality of life, mental health, clinical assessments of cognition and physical function, all-cause mortality and cost-effectiveness 3 and 6 months after ICU discharge will be evaluated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany (EA1/006/18). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and presented at international conferences. Study findings will also be disseminated via the website (www.eric-projekt.net). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03671447).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.