Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32977833›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2020

Implications for post critical illness trial design: sub-phenotyping trajectories of functional recovery among sepsis survivors.

Zudin A Puthucheary, Jochen S Gensichen, Aylin S Cakiroglu, Richard Cashmore, Lara Edbrooke, Christoph Heintze, Konrad Neumann, Tobias Wollersheim, Linda Denehy, Konrad F R Schmidt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Measuring health-related quality of life in sepsis survivors and caregivers: a mapping review and a preliminary conceptual framework.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Identifying Comorbid Subtypes of Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Zudin A PuthuchearyWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. z.puthucheary@qmul.ac.uk.
Jochen S GensichenInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Aylin S CakirogluThe Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Richard CashmoreCritical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, London, E1 1BB, UK.
Lara EdbrookePhysiotherapy Department, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Christoph HeintzeInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Konrad NeumannInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Tobias WollersheimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité University Medicine Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Linda DenehyPhysiotherapy Department, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Konrad F R SchmidtInstitute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5879-0664
LMU Klinikum · DEThe University of Melbourne · AUCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEQueen Mary University of London · GBRoyal London Hospital · GBThe Francis Crick Institute · GBZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie grant 01 E0 1002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients who survive critical illness suffer from a significant physical disability. The impact of rehabilitation strategies on health-related quality of life is inconsistent, with population heterogeneity cited as one potential confounder. This secondary analysis aimed to (1) examine trajectories of functional recovery in critically ill patients to delineate sub-phenotypes and (2) to assess differences between these cohorts in both clinical characteristics and clinimetric properties of physical function assessment tools.

methodsTwo hundred ninety-one adult sepsis survivors were followed-up for 24 months by telephone interviews. Physical function was assessed using the Physical Component Score (PCS) of the Short Form-36 Questionnaire (SF-36) and Activities of Daily Living and the Extra Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (XSFMA-F/B). Longitudinal trajectories were clustered by factor analysis. Logistical regression analyses were applied to patient characteristics potentially determining cluster allocation. Responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects and concurrent validity were assessed within clusters.

resultsOne hundred fifty-nine patients completed 24 months of follow-up, presenting overall low PCS scores. Two distinct sub-cohorts were identified, exhibiting complete recovery or persistent impairment. A third sub-cohort could not be classified into either trajectory. Age, education level and number of co-morbidities were independent determinants of poor recovery (AUROC 0.743 ((95%CI 0.659-0.826), p < 0.001). Those with complete recovery trajectories demonstrated high levels of ceiling effects in physical function (PF) (15%), role physical (RP) (45%) and body pain (BP) (57%) domains of the SF-36. Those with persistent impairment demonstrated high levels of floor effects in the same domains: PF (21%), RP (71%) and BP (12%). The PF domain demonstrated high responsiveness between ICU discharge and at 6 months and was predictive of a persistent impairment trajectory (AUROC 0.859 (95%CI 0.804-0.914), p < 0.001).

conclusionsWithin sepsis survivors, two distinct recovery trajectories of physical recovery were demonstrated. Older patients with more co-morbidities and lower educational achievements were more likely to have a persistent physical impairment trajectory. In regard to trajectory prediction, the PF score of the SF-36 was more responsive than the PCS and could be considered for primary outcomes. Future trials should consider adaptive trial designs that can deal with non-responders or sub-cohort specific outcome measures more effectively.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAdultAgedCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecovery of FunctionResearch DesignSepsisSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvivorsCo-morbidityHealth-related quality of life (HRQoL)Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS)Physical functionPost intensive care syndrome (PICS)Sepsis

Identifiers

PMID32977833
PMCPMC7517819
OpenAlexW3089293035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.