Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32977768›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Physician factors associated with increased risk for complaints in primary care emergency services: a case - control study.

Svein Zander Bratland, Valborg Baste, Knut Steen, Esperanza Diaz, Svein Gjelstad, Gunnar Tschudi Bondevik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Risk identification and prediction of complaints and misconduct against health practitioners: a scoping review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Svein Zander BratlandNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Kalfarveien 31, N-5018, Bergen, Norway. svein.bratland@uib.no.ORCID 0000-0002-9271-9367
Valborg BasteNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Kalfarveien 31, N-5018, Bergen, Norway.
Knut SteenNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Kalfarveien 31, N-5018, Bergen, Norway.
Esperanza DiazDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Kalfarveien 31, N-5018, Bergen, Norway.
Svein GjelstadDepartment of General Practice, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, Fredrik Holsts hus, N-0450, Oslo, Norway.
Gunnar Tschudi BondevikNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre, Kalfarveien 31, N-5018, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

Norske Legeforening 13/1386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient safety incidents defined as any unintended or unexpected incident that could have or were judged to have led to patient harm, are reported as relatively common. In this study patient complaints have been used as an indicator to uncover the occurrence of patient safety incidents in primary care emergency units (PCEUs) in Norway.

methodsTen PCEUs in major cities and rural parts of Norway participated. These units cover one third of the Norwegian population. A case-control design was applied. The case was the physician that evoked a complaint. The controls were three randomly chosen physicians from the same PCEU as the physician having evoked the complaint. The following variables regarding the physicians were chosen: gender, citizenship at, and years after authorization as physician, and specialty in general practice. The magnitude of patient contact was defined as the workload at the PCEU. The physicians' characteristics and workload were extracted from the medical records from the fourteen-day period prior to the consultation that elicited the complaint. The rest of the variables were then obtained from the Norwegian physician position register. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratio for complaints both unadjusted and adjusted for the independent variables. The data were analyzed using SPSS (Version25) and STATA.

resultsA total of 78 cases and 217 controls were included during 18 months (September 1st 2015 till March 1st 2017). The risk of evoking a complaint was significantly higher for physicians without specialty in general practice, and lower for those with medium low and medium high workload compared to physicians with no duty during the fourteen-day period prior to the index consultation. The limited strength of the study did not make it possible to assess any correlation between workload and the other variables (physician's gender, seniority and citizenship at time of authorization).

conclusionsContinuous medical training and achieving the specialty in general practice were decisively associated with a reduced risk for complaints in primary care emergency services. Future research should focus on elements promoting quality of care such as continuing education, duty rosters and other structural and organizational factors.

Indexed as

General PracticePhysiciansCase-Control StudiesFamily PracticeHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareCase-control studyEmergency medical servicesGeneral practiceGeneral practitionersMedical auditMedical errors

Identifiers

PMID32977768
PMCPMC7519491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.