Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32977746›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Pregnancy vs. paycheck: a qualitative study of patient's experience with employment during pregnancy at high risk for preterm birth.

Sarahn M Wheeler, Kelley E C Massengale, Konyin Adewumi, Thelma A Fitzgerald, Carrie B Dombeck, Teresa Swezey, Geeta K Swamy, Amy Corneli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Productivity Losses From Substance Use Disorder in the U.S. in 2023.American journal of preventive medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. EngagINg the COmmunity to Reduce Preterm birth via Adherence To an Individualized Prematurity Prevention Plan (INCORPorATe IP3): intervention development and future pilot study design.The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. "How Do I Prepare for This?" Patient Perspectives on Providers' Employment-related Support During Pregnancy.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarahn M WheelerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 2608 Erwin Road #210, Durham, NC, USA. sarahn.wheeler@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8384-3721
Kelley E C MassengaleDiaper Bank of North Carolina, 1311 E. Club Blvd, Durham, NC, USA.
Konyin AdewumiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 2608 Erwin Road #210, Durham, NC, USA.
Thelma A FitzgeraldDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 2608 Erwin Road #210, Durham, NC, USA.
Carrie B DombeckDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St. #210, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Teresa SwezeyDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St. #210, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Geeta K SwamyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 2608 Erwin Road #210, Durham, NC, USA.
Amy CorneliDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, 215 Morris St. #210, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Duke University · USBank of America · US

Funding

Duke CTSA (Composite)UL1TR001117 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, LI, JENNIFER S · 2013 to 2017
$41.3M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002554 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SVETKEY, LAURA P · 2018 to 2022
$8.2M
NCATS NIH HHS 1KL2TR002554NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002554NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001117NIH HHS UL1TR001117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant women with a history of preterm birth are at risk for recurrence, often requiring frequent prenatal visits for close monitoring and/or preventive therapies. Employment demands can limit uptake and adherence to recommended monitoring and preterm birth prevention therapies.

methodWe conducted a qualitative descriptive study using in-depth interviews (IDIs) of pregnant women with a history of preterm birth. IDIs were conducted by trained qualitative interviewers following a semi-structured interview guide focused on uncovering barriers and facilitators to initiation of prenatal care, including relevant employment experiences, and soliciting potential interventions to improve prompt prenatal care initiation. The IDIs were analyzed via applied thematic analysis.

resultsWe described the interview findings that address women's employment experiences. The current analysis includes 27 women who are majority self-described as non-Hispanic Black (74%) and publically insured (70%). Participants were employed in a range of professions; food services, childcare and retail were the most common occupations. Participants described multiple ways that being pregnant impacted their earning potential, ranging from voluntary work-hour reduction, involuntary duty hour reductions by employers, truncated promotions, and termination of employment. Participants also shared varying experiences with workplace accommodations to their work environment and job duties based on their pregnancy. Some of these accommodations were initiated by a collaborative employee/employer discussion, others were initiated by the employer's perception of safe working conditions in pregnancy, and some accommodations were based on medical recommendations. Participants described supportive and unsupportive employer reactions to requests for accommodations.

conclusionsOur findings provide novel insights into women's experiences balancing a pregnancy at increased risk for preterm birth with employment obligations. While many women reported positive experiences, the most striking insights came from women who described negative situations that ranged from challenging to potentially unlawful. Many of the findings suggest profound misunderstandings likely exist at the patient, employer and clinical provider level about the laws surrounding employment in pregnancy, safe employment responsibilities during pregnancy, and the range of creative accommodations that often allow for continued workplace productivity even during high risk pregnancy.

Indexed as

Premature BirthAdultEmploymentFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyPregnancy, High-RiskQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentEmploymentHigh risk pregnancyPreterm birthWork

Identifiers

PMID32977746
PMCPMC7517633
OpenAlexW3088336892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.