Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32977743›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2020

Patient and provider perspectives on the development and resolution of prescribing cascades: a qualitative study.

Barbara J Farrell, Lianne Jeffs, Hannah Irving, Lisa M McCarthy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Communication Processes Related to Decision-Making in Medication Management Between Healthcare Providers, Older People and Their Carers: A Systematic Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Loop diuretics and subsequent use of urinary symptom medications in older adults: evaluation of a possible prescribing cascade.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Real-World Complexity of Prescribing Cascades.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Barbara J FarrellBruyère Research Institute, 43 Bruyère St, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 5C8, Canada. bfarrell@bruyere.org.ORCID 0000-0002-2388-5353
Lianne JeffsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hannah IrvingBruyère Research Institute, 43 Bruyère St, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 5C8, Canada.
Lisa M McCarthyWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 376801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescribing cascades occur when the side effect of a medication is treated with a second medication. The aim of the study was to understand how prescribing cascades develop and persist and to identify strategies for their identification, prevention and management.

methodThis qualitative study employed semi-structured interviews to explore the existence of prescribing cascades and to gather patients', caregivers' and clinicians' perspectives about how prescribing cascades start, persist and how they might be resolved. Participants were older adults (over age 65) at an outpatient Geriatric Day Hospital (GDH) with possible prescribing cascades (identified by a GDH team member), their caregivers, and healthcare providers. Data were analyzed using an inductive content analysis approach.

resultsFourteen participants were interviewed (eight patients, one family caregiver, one GDH pharmacist, three GDH physicians and one family physician) providing a total of 22 interviews about patient-specific cases. The complexity and contextually situated nature of prescribing cascades created challenges for all of those involved with their identification. Three themes impacted how prescribing cascades developed and persisted: varying awareness of medications and cascades; varying feelings of accountability for making decisions about medication-related care; and accessibility to an ideal environment and relevant information. Actions to prevent, identify or resolve cascades were suggested.

conclusionPatients and healthcare providers struggled to recognize prescribing cascades and identify when they had occurred; knowledge gaps contributed to this challenge and led to inaction. Strategies that equip patients and clinicians with resources to recognize prescribing cascades and environmental and social supports that would help with their identification are needed. Current conceptualizations of cascades warrant additional refinement by considering the nuances our work raises regarding their appropriateness and directionality.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInappropriate PrescribingPhysiciansPolypharmacyAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFocus GroupsGeneral PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMalePhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchDrug therapyOlder adultsPrescribing cascadeProblematic polypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID32977743
PMCPMC7519478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.